Google Apps drops support for IE6
By Stuart Turton
Posted on 2 Feb 2010 at 08:23
Google Apps will no longer support Internet Explorer 6, as the search giant looks to encourage adoption of more advanced browsers.
"The web has evolved in the last ten years, from simple text pages to rich, interactive applications including video and voice," says Google on its blog.
"Unfortunately, very old browsers cannot run many of these new features effectively. So to help ensure your business can use the latest, most advanced web apps, we encourage you to update your browsers as soon as possible," it concludes.
The blog suggests that users upgrade to IE7, Firefox 3, Chrome, Safari 3 or later versions. Curiously, the list omits Opera, drawing heat from a number of posters.
To help ensure your business can use the latest, most advanced web apps, we encourage you to update your browsers as soon as possible
"Should I rant about Opera not being in that list?" wonders Ala care este. "Or is it just carelessness? Or maybe malicious?"
On the whole, however, the move away from IE6 has drawn support from commentators with Presidente noting that "this is great news for everybody that suffers with older browser support. I just hope other big companies will follow."
Google will officially stop supporting IE6 on 1 March, after which it warns "newer features may not be available and some features may even stop working".
While the move has been welcomed, it could serve to slow the adoption of Google Docs by big companies. According to figures from Net Applications', IE6 maintains a 20% share of the browser market, mostly among enterprise and Government bodies.
From around the web
The thing is users ie - "enterprise and government bodies" - block or do let there staff etc to use these services - here in the NHS they some times block even the MS websites! - it will not until like some one like the BBC or some one bigger to stop support IE6 before this crapware will die
Mark
By mprltd on 2 Feb 2010 ![]()
Unfortunately, that is so true Mark.
I'm a web developer, and I just have a painful day most of the time. I hate IE6 with a vengence, even IE7 can be painful.
Dare I say that I'm actually mostly comfortable with IE8, in terms of rendering pages correctly.
There have been many campaigns to dump IE6, but the truth of the problem is that the big corporates are the problem , mainly because some have internal systems that rely on IE6, upgrading breaks these systems.
It's convincing corporations to invest in correct technology, which of course involves costs and probably considerable amounts too.
As you say, if large corporations like the BBC dropped support for IE6, mostly at the same time, it would solve most of the problems.
But the reality, is that this problem is here to stay for a while yet.
By treadmill on 2 Feb 2010 ![]()
IE6 and
There is no reason why big companies and corporations cannot upgrade to different browsers, why not run IE6 and Firefox together, IE6 for your internal apps and firefox for web browsing.
Stop relying on microsoft browsers, they ain't that good.
By Barff1706 on 2 Feb 2010 ![]()
In the NHS hell will frezze over before they use anything other than MS there deluded thinking is they have a big company to sue and less likly to go bust if anything goes wrong becasue of an update or a new program. Plus they say loading FF onto the NHS the ICT team will not know what they are doing and it might stop things working some where else
Hence why a lot of places are stuck with IE6 and XP and it never change
Mark
By mprltd on 2 Feb 2010 ![]()
@Mark
See the thing is FF is not always as corporate friendly as IE is, e.g. can't be locked down / configured as much/easily which is one of the main reasons businesses are reluctant to take that step.
Also "Plus they say loading FF onto the NHS the ICT team will not know what they are doing" should not be a valid argument by any proper IT Dept!
However "and it might stop things working some where else" is actually a valid argument but it will depend on what existing systems are in place and what way they have been designed. Sole use of FF may well mean some web based software won't work and unfortunately upgrading this software is not an necessarily an easy nor cheap task, especially given the govts/nhs IT systems track record of hiring the wrong contractors who under deliver and run way over budget and timescale.
By koshthetrekkie on 2 Feb 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why antivirus is fighting a losing battle in your office
- Four year olds used to steal their parents' data
- An acceptable use policy for your kids
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Pavement hacking: What it is and how to avoid it
- Google's risky pre-loaded pages
- Mac under attack: how secure is Apple's OS?
- Has your browser been hijacked?
advertisement
