Secret trade talks take aim at internet piracy
By Stewart Mitchell
Posted on 5 Nov 2009 at 13:16
Internet rights campaigners are expressing serious concerns over information leaking out of the controversial Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) negotiations taking place in Korea.
The ACTA talks are far-reaching international trade talks that have major implications for the internet, but consumer rights campaigners say the talks have been hijacked by lobbyists and negotiators for media heavyweights, such as Hollywood studios and Rupert Murdoch's News International.
Details emerging from the meeting suggest that rather than focusing on commercially counterfeit goods, the delegates are discussing copyright protection and how to force ISPs to police their networks.
“The leaks confirm everything that we feared about the secret ACTA negotiations
“From the copies of the leaked material, which are but an outline of the agreement under negotiation, it is clear that the talks are reaching into areas like personal copyright and three strikes rules that reach into the home,” Intellectual Property Watch spokesperson William New told PC Pro.
According to observers, if implemented, the ACTA could drastically alter intellectual property enforcement in all countries and trade zones signing up to the treaty, including the EU.
ISPs held liable
Sources that have seen the leaks say ACTA signatories would have to reinforce copyright enforcement, impose liability for copyright breaches on third parties, such as ISPs, and implement a graduated response rule to cut off repeat copyright offenders.
The agreement would also force signatories to implement anti-circumvention rules to outlaw breaking DRM.
“The leaks confirm everything that we feared about the secret ACTA negotiations,” writes Electronic Frontier Foundation policy director Gwen Hinze, on the organisation's website.
“The internet provisions have nothing to do with addressing counterfeit products, but are all about imposing a set of copyright industry demands on the global internet, including obligations on ISPs to adopt three-strikes internet disconnection policies, and a global expansion of DMCA-style laws.”
The furore surrounding the talks has been exacerbated by the fact that they are being held behind closed doors amid almost complete secrecy. The only outsiders to have been given official briefings – mostly major media owners and advisers – have signed non-disclosure agreements and have not been allowed to remove any material related to the meetings.
“They are international trade negotiators that are running the meeting, but it's hard to find evidence that public interest concerns are being represented,” said New. “The negotiators are working under close advice and counsel of the industry.”
From around the web
He who bribes the lawmaker, rules the world...
No matter who you vote for, Corporate America calls the shots.
From the price of the iPhone, to who dictates what is acceptable on the internet. You don't get a say.
Welcome to the illusion of democracy!
One question: If torrent sites go pasword only and DRM their .torrent files, would the music industry be arrested for breaking the DRM on those files? No, thought not.
To quote 2000AD, "There's no justice, just us!"
By cheysuli on 5 Nov 2009 ![]()
That's it...
I'm joining the Pirate Party.
By Mr_Flynn on 5 Nov 2009 ![]()
splundig vir thrigg
By darkhairedlord on 5 Nov 2009 ![]()
Uh oh
I don't know what worries me more. The fact that this is as close to the legendary "New World Order" as I've seen since the end of the cold war, or the fact that only 3 people have bothered to comment on it.
What we are seeing here is nothing less than a global multinational conspiracy by big business to destroy consumer rights, and to reduce "ownership" to a lease agreement.
We've already seen it with computers where the software dies when the hardware does, and music/movies where DRM means that you can't play them on the device of your choice. And now were's seeing it extended to everything.
Shame on everybody involved, and on everybody who isn't complaining about this gross breach of our liberties.
By Perfectblue97 on 10 Nov 2009 ![]()
Seen it all before
Remember when some internet music stores DRM protected their content and saw their sales drop while those that didn't saw their sales rise.
By smukie on 12 Nov 2009 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why antivirus is fighting a losing battle in your office
- Four year olds used to steal their parents' data
- An acceptable use policy for your kids
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Pavement hacking: What it is and how to avoid it
- Google's risky pre-loaded pages
- Mac under attack: how secure is Apple's OS?
- Has your browser been hijacked?
advertisement
