Windows 7 most popular OS for Microsoft security software
Posted on 16 Oct 2009 at 13:24
Almost half of the people who've download Microsoft's new security software are running Windows 7.
No fewer than 44% of the people who've downloaded the free Microsoft Security Essentials are running Windows 7, according to the company, despite the fact that the operating system hasn't even been officially launched yet.
Windows XP comes in second place, with 33% of the downloads, while Vista brings up the rear on 23%.
About a third of Windows 7 Microsoft Security Essentials machines are 64-bit, which is even more resistant to malware than 32-bit due to PatchGuard
The figures are undoubtedly encouraging for Microsoft, although the vast majority of those Windows 7 users will still be using the free Release Candidate software, and therefore may baulk at paying for security software for an operating system that will expire next Spring.
Yet, despite the fact that Windows 7 is the most widely used OS for Security Essentials, it's recording the fewest malware detections.
Only 16% of the detections have taken place on Windows 7 machines, according to Microsoft's normalised figures. Vista accounts for 32% of attacks while Windows XP hits 52%.
"The Windows 7 numbers are spectacular for an operating system that hasn't yet released for global availability," the software giant's Joe Faulhaber comments on the Microsoft Malware Protection Center blog. "Even better, about a third of Windows 7 Microsoft Security Essentials machines are 64-bit, which is even more resistant to malware than 32-bit due to PatchGuard."
"By looking at detections divided by active Microsoft Security Essentials machines over the whole population, we see far more detections per XP machine, with the fewest from Win7. This follows our usual observed trend of seeing less malware on newer OSes and service packs."
You can read our review of Microsoft Security Essentials here.
Author: Barry Collins and Jon Honeyball
Why I installed Security Essentials on RC - but will likely stick with it
Because the release candidate was never going to be running for very long on my machine and I'd already been assiduous about backups before installing it, I initially did not install any AV software on Windows 7.
Perceived performance had always been a problem under Vista, and AVG 8 did seem to contribute to this.
After 3 months of running with no anti-virus software, I installed MS Security Essentials when it became available. A full scan revealed no viruses and I have noticed no negative impact on performance or boot up times.
Despite the launch of AV9, I'm inclined to re-install Security Essentials when Windows 7 is released.
By Cantabrian on 17 Oct 2009 
advertisement
- 10 ways to boost traffic to a WordPress blog
- Reaction to the Apple iPad: ten days later
- How to switch off Virgin Media's mobile broadband image compression
- Infotec/Ricoh: here not to help
- TomTom 940T vs iPhone TomTom: a real road test
- Nvidia Fermi update: they have names!
- Twitter oven lets you have your cake and tweet it
- Where online businesses go terribly wrong
- Google Nexus One: first look review
- Dreading the move to ADSL
- Avira Premium Security Suite 9
- ZoneAlarm Internet Security Suite
- Webroot Internet Security Essentials
- Trend Micro Internet Security
- PC Tools Internet Security 2009
- Panda Internet Security 2009
- Norton Internet Security 2009
- Kaspersky Internet Security 2009
- F-Secure Internet Security 2009
- Eset Smart Security
- Microsoft must stop silently installing browser plugins
- Poking into Facebook security
- Has Microsoft shot itself in the foot with Security Essentials?
- Wi-Fi hacking: don't panic yet
- Gary McKinnon deserves prosecution not extradition
- Sex and online security: how much danger are we really in?
- Security without penalty
- The spam is out, but the viruses are in
- Security without a smile
- Security by numbers
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

