Firefox offers slower release cycle for business
By Nicole Kobie
Posted on 23 Sep 2011 at 09:33
Mozilla has unveiled plans to slow down its release schedule to help out businesses.
The Firefox maker sped up its release cycle to six-weekly iterations, following the lead of Google's Chrome, earlier this year.
The move sparked complaints from business users, who found it difficult to keep up and had problems with the version they were on reaching end-of-life and no longer getting security updates.
That wasn't helped by Mozilla community coordinator Asa Dotzler saying: "A minute spent making a corporate user happy can better be spent making many regular users happy."
Over time, and ESR will be less secure than the regular release of Firefox
The situation highlighted the difference between corporate user, that need longer to upgrade, and consumers.
"These groups — which include small & medium business, enterprise, academic, and government — want to continue to offer Mozilla products to their users, but they need a version of Firefox that gives them a longer support tail than what we currently offer," Mozilla said.
In response, the open-source development group started the Mozilla Enterprise User Working Group. Just a few weeks in, and it's already looking at creating an extended release cycle.
Essentially, business users would use an "Extended Support Release" version, which would be maintained for seven standard update cycles, meaning corporate users would only have to upgrade once every 42 weeks.
At that point, there would be a two cycle overlap between the new version and the old one before it is killed off, giving companies 12 weeks to sort out their upgrades.
If all goes to plan, the first ESR will arrive with Firefox 8 or 9. Companies that don't like the plan won't be left with any other options, however, as Firefox 3.6 - which is still being supported - will be moved to end of life after the first ESR, so corporate users must move to the new system.
The solution fixes some problems, but raises others - notably in security.
"The ESR will not have the benefit of large scale testing by nightly and beta groups," Mozilla warned. "As a result, the potential for the introduction of bugs which affect ESR users will be greater, and that risk needs to be understood and accepted by groups that deploy it."
Mozilla said it would encourage organisations to help out by getting involved with testing the ESR.
"Over time, and ESR will be less secure than the regular release of Firefox, as new functionality will not be added at the same pace as Firefox, and only high-risk/impact security patches will be backported," Mozilla added. "It is important that organisations deploying this software understand and accept this."
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
Two lines at once?
Do Mozilla really intend to keep two lines running at once? Seems a crazy idea to me - am I being cynical in saying that after X months, they'll say "Well, we tried but it doesn't work?"
Frankly, even as a personal user I'd prefer to be on the proposed business cycle. I'm fed up of seeing plug-ins fail because Mozilla can't be bothered to design compatible software. The latest is Ancestry.com's image plug-in - Ancestry's technical guy implied that he was fed up chasing Mozilla's changes when the browser's user functionality was only changing in a minor fashion. As a result, we just get thrown back to dealing with .JPGs while Ancestry write something that doesn't use Mozilla's plug-in structure. Well, we're not quite back to that - I'm using IE again, where the IE "plug-in" works. So much for Mozilla's "My version number's bigger than yours..."
By AdrianB on 23 Sep 2011
as i said my months back, this rapidly increasing version numbering will stop as soon as they 'catch-up' with Internet Explorer. its all about perception, they have decided that some people think ie must be better because its x numbers ahead
By kingct on 24 Sep 2011
I think they must have listened to Darien on the podcast!
By LdnJon on 25 Sep 2011
- How Google Glass ruined my lunch hour
- Smartphone battery packs: can a USB power pack beat the festival battery blues?
- Windows Easy Transfer – not so "easy" in Windows 8.1
- Formula 1: what a difference virtualisation makes
- Office of the future: comfy chairs and tablets everywhere
- I went to Glastonbury and the only thing that got high was my smartphone
- Meet the robots helping teach children
- PaperLater: would you pay to print the internet?
- Amazon vs Kobo: how much to make the ebook switch?
- Phishing emails: how I nearly got caught out
- How to add in-app purchasing to an iPhone, Android or Windows app
- Remote-control ransomware: TeamViewer and software hardball
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- Raspberry Pi and Wolfram: a must-have for every child
- Could you get by with Office Web Apps?