Jury confirms SCO doesn't own Unix
By Stuart Turton
Posted on 31 Mar 2010 at 09:23
SCO has suffered a potentially fatal blow in its epic legal battle with Novell, after a jury ruled that Novell still owned the copyrights to the Unix operating system.
The two companies have been fighting it out for six years, after SCO sued IBM and then Novell for infringing its Unix SVRX copyrights. The company demanded royalties for every license sold by the companies after Novell sold it the Unix source code back in 1995.
Obviously, we're disappointed in the jury's decision. We were confident in the case, but there's some important claims remaining to be decided by a judge
SCO argued that a 1996 amendment to the deal also transferred the Unix copyright, a point denied by Novell, which argued that it held onto the copyrights in order to collect royalties on legacy Unix licenses.
Back in 2008, a judge ruled in favour of Novell, ordering SCO to cough up $2.5 million in royalties it had falsely collected from partners including Sun, plus interest, which ran to an extra $900,000.
However, an appeals court overruled the decision, claiming the matter could only be settled by a jury trial. But even the jury's decision may not be enough to finally put the case to bed.
"Obviously, we're disappointed in the jury's decision," said SCO Stuart Singer. "We were confident in the case, but there's some important claims remaining to be decided by a judge."
SCO now plans to ask the courts to award the copyrights to SCO. "It's a setback, but it's not over," added Singer.
However, that couldn't dampen Novell's jubilation. "Novell is very pleased with the jury's decision confirming Novell's ownership of the Unix copyrights, which SCO had asserted to own in its attack on Linux," said the company.
"Novell remains committed to promoting Linux, including by defending Linux on the intellectual property front," it concluded.
From around the web
Sooo...
Microsoft's plot against Linux failed?
By Lomskij on 31 Mar 2010 ![]()
I can still remember...
the days when our payroll computer was running Microsoft's version of UNIX (Xenix), which they sold to the Santa Cruz Operation (later just SCO), who re-branded it SCO UNIX.
Mind you, that SCO had had their own Linux and provided code to the Linux code base, they were always on a hiding to nothing to claim it infringed their copyright! :-D
This is yet another blow.
By big_D on 31 Mar 2010 ![]()
That SCO has no relation to the current SCO.
The original SCO became Tarantella, whilst this current SCO arose from when Caldera purchased some of the original assets.
Just goes to show, the usual anti-M/S clap-trap pushers don't know their history as they (M/S) sold Xenix to the original SCO in exchange for a quarter ownership.
By Ex_Sailor on 31 Mar 2010 ![]()
@Ex_Sailor, you may know your ancient (unix) history but you're a bit out of date. Microsoft have (allegedly) twice been involved in funding SCO during their litigation phase. However the whole story is now so convoluted that it's alomost impossible to unpick.
The anonymous author of this PCPro article is also wrong. The $2.5m royalty payment was NOT overturned by the appeal court. The appeal court overturned the summary judgement on copyright and remanded it to a jury trial.
By milliganp on 1 Apr 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
