Skip to navigation
Latest News

Greenpeace warns of coal-powered cloud

Iceberg

By Reuters

Posted on 30 Mar 2010 at 09:42

The 'cloud' of data that is becoming the heart of the internet is creating an all-too-real cloud of pollution, according to Greenpeace.

A Facebook facility being built in Oregon will be largely fuelled by coal, while Apple is building a data warehouse in North Carolina region that relies mostly on coal, the environmental organisation claims in a new study.

"The last thing we need is for more cloud infrastructure to be built in places where it increases demand for dirty coal-fired power," said Greenpeace, which argues that web companies should be more careful about where they build and should lobby more in Washington for clean energy.

The last thing we need is for more cloud infrastructure to be built in places where it increases demand for dirty coal-fired power

The growing mass of business data, home movies and pictures has ballooned beyond the capabilities of many corporate data centers and PCs, spurring the creation of massive server farms that make up "the cloud".

Data center energy use is already huge, Greenpeace said. If considered as a country, the global telecommunications and data centers behind cloud computing would be ranked fifth in the world for energy use in 2007, behind the US, China, Russia and Japan, it concluded.

The cloud may be the fastest-growing facet of technology infrastructure between now and 2020, Greenpeace added.

The Greenpeace report comes during a global debate on whether to create caps or other measures to cut use of carbon-heavy fuels such as coal, and curb climate change.

Cheap and plentiful, coal is the top fuel for US power plants, and its low cost versus alternative fuels makes it attractive, even in highly energy-efficient data centers. Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, Yahoo and Google have at least some centers that rely heavily on coal power, said Greenpeace.

Corporate secrets

Most of the companies declined to give details of their data centers. All said, however, they considered the environment in business decisions, and most said they were aggressively pursuing energy efficiency.

Apple, for example, has released its carbon footprint (or how much greenhouse gases it produce), and Facebook said it chose the location for its center to use natural means to cool its machines.

Microsoft said it aimed to maximise efficiency, and Google said it purchased carbon offsets - funding for projects which suck up carbon - for emissions, including at data centers.

Yahoo, which is building a center near Buffalo, New York, that Greenpeace saw as a model, will get energy from hydroelectric facilities. The company said energy-efficiency was its top goal, with a building design that promotes air circulation.

Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here

From around the web

User comments

What do you expect

Modern cloud data-centers are being designed from the ground up to minimise energy consumption. Consolidation of facilities allow efficiencies that traditional data centers in mixed use buildings could never aspire to. Greenpeace will complain about something -whatever the industry does. How about putting a data center inside a neuclear power site. Then you'll have both low carbon and maximum security.

By milliganp on 30 Mar 2010

Does anyone remember the good old days where we used to have limits on what we could store/send?? These limits forced people to be tidy and keep only what they needed. Thanks to our new server at work we have a massive collection of data thats no longer used but is available on the server simply because theres room. If Facebook etc... simply impose some kind of limit they wouldn't have a need to constantly expand and thus save the planet and people would be more clutter free!!! How about an expiry date on uploaded photos? Does anyone really look at that album you posted 3 years ago?!?!

By anthonysjones on 30 Mar 2010

Hmm

Its a strange situation at the moment Nuclear looks better from a Greenhouse gas perspective than coal, but that ignores the long term view on waste management.

I would have thought solar collectors, wind and tidal would be more advanced by now, but speaking from local experience the Tidal Generator in Belfast opended with a fanfare and then went suspiciously quiet after developing "issues"

Ever expanding storage and server farms is clearly not the best environmental plan per se, but then again its better to web conference than it is to hit the Boeing 777?

Overall it would be nice to see the Green Parties and Greenpeace reduce the bluster and produce more on the solutions side of things. It's too easy to sit bickering and bitching on the sidelines.

By Gindylow on 31 Mar 2010

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

advertisement

Most Commented News Stories
More From PC Pro
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest ReviewsSubscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.