Councils snub Government broadband funding
By Nicole Kobie
Posted on 8 Mar 2012 at 16:43
A pair of Tyneside councils have opted not take part in Government broadband funding.
All local authorities were supposed to file plans with the Department of Culture, Media and Sport by the end of last month, showing how they intended to meet broadband targets of 90% superfast coverage.
Two councils - North and South Tyneside - have failed to submit their initial plans, with one saying it didn't want to apply for funds from the £530 million pot.
A spokeswoman for North Tyneside Council said BT and Virgin Media expect to cover 91% of the area before the 2015 deadline without additional Government investment.
North and South Tyneside seem blithely confident they will deliver world class digital infrastructure
"North Tyneside and South Tyneside have told the Government they will achieve 90% superfast broadband coverage through other means and have expressed no interest in using their allocated funding to go further," the DCMS said in a statement.
Any funds handed out by the DCMS must be matched by the council. North Tyneside was previously approved for £880,000 in funds, but opted to decline the money, with mayor Linda Arkey saying earlier this year that spending council money on upgrading the network was an unnecessary financial burden.
"In this instance, given the pressures on resources at the present time, we felt that the benefits of increasing the coverage of super-fast broadband across the remaining nine per cent of the borough would be limited and therefore a low priority when deciding how best to spend council taxpayers' money," she said.
The Government suggested the council's apparent dependence on private broadband investment may be misplaced.
"North and South Tyneside seem blithely confident they will deliver world class digital infrastructure - I just hope they are not being complacent," said culture minister Jeremy Hunt. "No one in the UK can afford to slack on making sure we have the best broadband network in Europe upon which so many of the jobs of the future depend.”
The DCMS said all other councils had filed plans, and five more had funding approved, meaning 40% of local authorities were now ready to start procurement on next-gen networks ahead of an April deadline.
South Tyneside Council has yet to respond to request for comment.
That's somewhat ironic
A conservative government complaining that a council wants to not spend money it (perceives) it doesn't have to because the work will be (is expected to) be completed by the private sector... thus also saving the expenditure of a similar amount from the general tax pot?
I'm not sure either way what the "right" thing to do is (or the right plan would be) but its hard to ignore the oddity of the position...
By Murph on 8 Mar 2012
Waste of Time
IMHO the fragmentation of this 'broadband plan', being devolved to local authorities as it is, is the completetly wrong approach.
Broadband infrastructure is a project of national importance (akin to the development of the national grid in the 1930s) and so should be sponsored at a national level.
But hey, what do I know other than government at all levels find it so easy to waste our money.
By jontym123 on 9 Mar 2012
It's an urban area, so quite reasonable to suppose that Virgin will deliver as they can expect it to be financially worthwhile. If it was a predominantly rural area it would be a very different situation
By valeofyork on 9 Mar 2012
"I just hope they are not being complacent," said culture minister Jeremy Hunt. "No one in the UK can afford to slack on making sure we have the best broadband network in Europe upon which so many of the jobs of the future depend.”
Ironic coming from a man implementing a half-arsed approach to get a half-arsed network.
By Mark_Thompson on 11 Mar 2012
- Google Glass: mugger bait, pub problem and other lessons learned from two dangerous weeks
- Twitter, please don't fiddle with my feed
- How Satya Nadella can get some pay-raise karma
- Windows 10: a step back to go forward
- Michael Dell: Cloud infrastructure is the roads, bridges and highways of the 21st century
- How to check your identity hasn’t been sold to the hackers
- Tim Cook: this is how much TV has changed since the 70s
- Westminster wins the .London battle
- 20 years of PC Pro: from deep pan pizza to virtualisation
- Five reasons why the Apple Watch leaves me cold