Customers fume as BT introduces IP sharing
By Nicole Kobie
Posted on 3 May 2013 at 16:20
BT is testing a system that would see broadband customers share IP addresses to avoid the looming IPv4 shortage.
The current IPv4 system is running out of space, and many ISPs and users aren't yet ready to switch to its successor, IPv6.
As a solution, BT is testing a technology called Carrier Grade NAT (CGNAT), which has already been trialed by Plusnet, an ISP owned by BT.
BT said its CGNAT trial would see a single IP address shared between up to 10 customers. "This is the same as the standard practice for mobile broadband connections, using smartphones and tablets today," BT added.
However, CGNAT means you can't set up port forwarding on your router, causing problems for anyone hosting a website or online game. The trial will be tested with customers on BT's "Option 1 Total Broadband" - it's lowest tier, "who on average use the internet the least", the company said.
We do not think these customers will notice any difference at all in their broadband performance
"We believe they are the least likely group of customers to experience any issues or disruptions due to CGNAT, which can interfere with complex online activities like hosting servers at home," BT said. "We do not think these customers will notice any difference at all in their broadband performance, but if any of these customers did have any resulting issues, we would be happy to restore their connection to an individual IP address."
However, it appears users are already noticing problems. "It's causing me a real headache, for a start none of my home servers are now accessible via the web, remote access to my PC is also blocked, and XBox Live requires NAT to be open to work correctly so has reduced multiplayer ability," said one user on the BT forums. "If BT has decided to roll out this solution I really hope that it realises the issues it'll cause its customers."
BT didn't say how many users would be affected or how long the CGNAT trial would run.
BT stressed that it's working to move to IPv6 this year, but said customers will need both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses "for the forseeable future".
(Thanks to PC Pro reader Richard Samson for the tip-off)
I hope they don't spread this to infinity 2, I use a VPN (among other things e.g. XBL) to connect to my home network so this will be a problem.
I am however IPV6 ready.
Does anyone know if this affects PSN? My brother has a low tier BT package and uses PSN allot.
By tech3475 on 3 May 2013
Wont this cause problems for those trying to track down those pesky kids who download illegally. And what if I share an ip with one of them!
By billy_love on 3 May 2013
Why don't they just give new customers IPv6?
That' what the German equivalent of BT is doing. Customers also don't get a telephone line now, they get VOIP only, unless they pay extra.
By big_D on 5 May 2013
Usual BT foot dragging
Sounds great, but then BT always like to drag things out, you only have to look at ISDN for that.
Presumably they see this as a cost skimming alternative.
By Gindylow on 9 May 2013
won't invest prpperly
Rub people up the wrong way and they shift top another isp
By IMACOMPUTERBUDD1 on 9 May 2013
IPv7 Urgently Needed!
What is urgently needed is IPv7, which should be a development of IPv4 with a wider address range, simple as that.
The fundamental reason that IPv6 has not been rolled out is its needless complexity, and that it introduces a myriad of potential security problems due to its numerous untested and unwanted gimmicks. Because of this, most admins turn it off.
All we actually needed was an increase in address width, instead we were offered an unholy mess. That we said 'no' en masse should not be a surprise.
By Anteaus on 22 Nov 2013
By bet1001 on 5 Dec 2013
- How to check your identity hasn’t been sold to the hackers
- Tim Cook: this is how much TV has changed since the 70s
- Westminster wins the .London battle
- 20 years of PC Pro: from deep pan pizza to virtualisation
- Five reasons why the Apple Watch leaves me cold
- Apple Watch, iPhone 6 and 6 Plus: Tim Cook's Apple back with a bang?
- BT Home Hub 5: how to get maximum speed
- 20 years of PC Pro: one-star reviews (including "the worst tablet we've ever seen")
- 20 years of PC Pro: our best covers
- Why we've closed the PC Pro forums
- ZoneAlarm Internet Security Suite
- Webroot Internet Security Essentials
- Trend Micro Internet Security
- PC Tools Internet Security 2009
- Panda Internet Security 2009
- Norton Internet Security 2009
- Kaspersky Internet Security 2009
- F-Secure Internet Security 2009
- AVG Internet Security 8
- BullGuard Internet Security 8.5