MPs: Government should scrap broadband tax
By Barry Collins
Posted on 23 Feb 2010 at 08:54
A committee of MPs has called for the Government’s proposed 50p “broadband tax” to be scrapped.
The 50p per month levy is designed to bring next-generation broadband to the vast majority of the country, but the Business, Innovation and Skills Committee warns that the tax is “ill-directed” and “regressive”.
The cross-party committee warns that the tax will largely benefit the richer members of society, who are generally more willing to pay for high-speed broadband. “We believe that a 50 pence levy placed on fixed telecommunication lines is an ill-directed charge,” the committee reports. “It will place a disproportionate cost on a majority who will not, or are unable to, reap the benefits of that charge.
Related news
Government doesn't know what 2 meg promise means“The levy is a regressive tax under which a minority of users will receive enhancements to their services paid for by a majority who appear unlikely to access these services. The Government must look again at this proposal.”
The committee took evidence from a small selection of ISPs, including TalkTalk, which repeated its long-held argument that throwing public funds at next-gen broadband would be a waste of money, “with operators delaying the network rollout so that they tap into public funding… as a result much of the public money will not create new investment but be simply wasted funding projects that were going to happen anyway.”
Money ring-fenced?
Either the levy will be hypothecated or not, and the Government needs to give clarity on this
The MPs also raised concerns over whether the broadband tax would be ring-fenced purely for investment in next-gen networks, or merely added to the general taxation pool. The committee criticised a response from the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), which said that “We expect the amount raised by the landline duty to be made available for the delivery of the NGA [Next Generation Access] objectives through the Next Generation Fund,” but warned that “few taxes are formally ring-fenced”.
“We find this a somewhat Delphic response,” the MPs stated. “Either the levy will be hypothecated or not, and the Government needs to give clarity on this before it brings proposals before the House to introduce the levy.”
From around the web
I understand the main purpose of the new proposed tax on landlines is to to pay for broadband access for people in remote areas where it is not commercially viable to do so.
Yet I have to ask, why should i pay for somebody else's broadband, just because they live in a remote area? Nobody else pays for my broadband.
If it is more expensive to provide broadband in remote areas, then people living there should pay more to cover those costs. People living in remote areas gain advantages such as cheaper housing, beautiful views, more peace and quiet etc. Surely then they should pay for any disadvantages.
Besides, nobody is forced to live in remote areas, it is their choice to do so. Why should I be taxed for other people's choices?
To my mind this is yet another new Labour tax. Even if it is relatively small now at £6 plus VAT (£7.05) per year, small taxes have a history of growing into big taxes. For example VAT was only 10% when it was launched yet it is now 17.5% and there is talk of it becoming 20% after the next election.
By digitallogic on 27 Feb 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- How to install Internet Explorer 9
- Maintaining and supporting IE9
- Plan your deployment
- Creating a custom browser package
- Search in corporate environments
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- ZoneAlarm Internet Security Suite
- Webroot Internet Security Essentials
- Trend Micro Internet Security
- PC Tools Internet Security 2009
- Panda Internet Security 2009
- Norton Internet Security 2009
- Kaspersky Internet Security 2009
- F-Secure Internet Security 2009
- AVG Internet Security 8
- BullGuard Internet Security 8.5
advertisement
