Vodafone rebuked for "abolishing" roaming charges
Posted on 28 Oct 2009 at 10:35
Vodafone has been reprimanded by the Advertising Standards Authority for claiming that it had "abolished" mobile roaming charges.
A series of internet, SMS and print ads run by the mobile network over the summer claimed the company had "abolished" the extra fees for making calls in 35 European countries.
That provoked the ire of no fewer than 21 complainants, who argued that the word "abolished" implied that Vodafone had axed the charges permanently, rather than for only three months over the summer.
'Abolished' could be construed in several ways - Vodafone
Vodafone reached for the Oxford Concise before putting up its defence, arguing that "the dictionary definition of 'abolished' was 'formally put an end to' and it did not necessarily mean the perpetual end or that something ceased to exist in its entirety."
Indeed, the Vodafone lexicographers argued that "the word could be construed in several ways and therefore it was reasonable to expect that it would be qualified."
The ASA wasn't swayed by the argument, however, upholding five out of six complaints about the various ads. "We considered consumers were likely to understand the ads, in particular the word 'abolished', to mean that roaming charges had been removed permanently, as opposed to having been suspended temporarily," the ASA's adjudication states. "Because that was not the case, we concluded that the ads were misleading."
Vodafone has been told not to run the ads again - a sanction that carries about as much weight as Kate Moss, given the promotion ended in August.
The company has also been told "to ensure that significant conditions of promotions were made clear, and did not contradict the main claim, in future ads."
Author: Barry Collins
What a ridiculous argument. Vodafone have gone down in my estimation - why would I want to be a customer of a company that is clearly devious in how it uses language. Everyone knows that "put an end to" does NOT mean "we fully intend to start again in 3 months". At the very least it means "we currently have no plans to start it again".
Hopefully they will lose some potential customers seeing as the ASA sanctioned punishment is meaningless.
By halsteadk on 28 Oct 2009 
Hardly surprising, is it? Having redefined the meaning of "unlimited", the mobile phone companies are moving on to further mangling of the language.
By davidbryant4 on 28 Oct 2009 
Meh
Although I agree the word abolished was a poor choice, they did make it clear it was a limited time in the adverts.
" sanction that carries about as much weight as Kate Moss, given the promotion ended in August"
Nice one Barry.
By JStairmand on 28 Oct 2009 
@JStairmand - I think regardless of the small print they dug their hole deeper by later claiming they meant "abolished" as "formally put an end to" - which they clearly didn't if they fully intended to re-start what they were "ending".
By halsteadk on 29 Oct 2009 
advertisement
- Why Britain's watchdogs have fewer teeth than goldfish
- Tabbed documents: how to make Office 2010 great
- Outlook 2010 People Pane – does it spell death to Xobni
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots
- Co-Authoring in Word 2010 and SharePoint Foundation 2010
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots: Backstage view
- Flash 10.1: Developing for Desktop and Device
- Microsoft Office 2010 screenshots: Recover unsaved items
- Microsoft Word 2010 screenshots: Text Effects
- Microsoft Word 2010: inserting screenshots
- ZoneAlarm Internet Security Suite
- Webroot Internet Security Essentials
- Trend Micro Internet Security
- PC Tools Internet Security 2009
- Panda Internet Security 2009
- Norton Internet Security 2009
- Kaspersky Internet Security 2009
- F-Secure Internet Security 2009
- AVG Internet Security 8
- BullGuard Internet Security 8.5
- SMC ADSL2 Barricade-N Pro
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk


