Can Twitter and Facebook deal with their dead?
By Stewart Mitchell
Posted on 12 Aug 2010 at 10:40
Such a move would mirror Facebook's policy on using a dead user's account as a memorial, where existing friends can post messages or condolences. Psychiatrists we have spoken to say such memorials can help in dealing with bereavement in the same way as going to a funeral or leaving flowers at a crash site.
However, while some have called for more access to their relatives' accounts, privacy rules dictate that personal details should be protected.
Today, you get a shoe box full of pictures, tomorrow you will get a Flickr account
There are, for example, very good reasons why someone may have kept the email messages in their Facebook account secret from their family, and discovering those details after a bereavement may cause unforeseen unpleasantness.
According to Facebook, when the next of kin provides proof of death for an account, the company makes several changes to the privacy settings of an account and blocks access to prevent anyone unauthorised from logging in to the user's account and reading private message, or even sending fake messages from the grave.
“When an account is memorialised, we also set privacy so that only confirmed friends can see the profile or locate it in search,” the company said in a statement.
“We try to protect the deceased's privacy by removing sensitive information such as contact information and status updates. Memorialising an account also prevents anyone from logging into it in the future, while still enabling friends and family to leave posts on the profile Wall in remembrance.”
That said, that are plenty of forums posters who complain that Facebook has not been quick enough in dealing with requests to deactivate accounts following the death of a relative.
Legacy Lockers
The two main social networks may be addressing the issue, but they are only a small part of peoples' online footprint. Sorting out all the loose ends online can be complicated, which is why companies such as Legacy Locker have found a niche, by providing a service that treats online assets in the same way that a will covers offline provision.
“Today, you get a shoe box full of pictures, tomorrow you will get a Flickr account,” said Legacy Locker CEO, Jeremy Toeman in his blog. “Today, you get a diary, tomorrow you will get a blog.”
Given the complexity of getting a loved one's affairs in order at what is already a stressful time, some feel there should be more help in dealing with accounts left active.
The Bereavement Register, for example, was set up after complaints from the public over being reminded of their loss each time the postman delivered junk mail in the name of the deceased. Staff there believe a similar system would help online.
“The Bereavement Register is a free consumer service backed by Government departments, which removes deceased records from company databases,” said a spokesperson for the service. “This stops the bereaved from receiving direct mail, which can be a painful daily reminder.
“While a few people may be comforted by receiving direct mail addressed to a loved one who has died, we find that the vast majority of people prefer it to stop and it would be a really good idea if there was a similar service for online accounts.”
In the meantime, social networkers and anyone with a large online portfolio should consider setting up and maintaining a file that includes details of accounts and, where appropriate, passwords so that the next of kin or executer can take control of accounts after death.
From around the web
Interesting
Something I had never thought about.
By mviracca on 12 Aug 2010 ![]()
Social networking will?
"In the event of my death, please email mum@thefamilyuk.com" ?
By cheysuli on 12 Aug 2010 ![]()
I think this is critical issue, which is much wider than simply social networking. People's digital footprint is becoming increasingly bigger, how do my relatives know what to do with my Yahoo e-mail account or my photos on Flickr? Do they even know I have photos on Flickr? I don't print many photos, so if the account is deleted the images may be lost, unless they figure out how to log-in to my laptop or access my wireless network and get at my NAS.
Now that many financial and utility companies provide paperless statements there could be very little to work with when someone passes away.
A little morbid but perhaps this all needs to be in an annex to my Will ... :-o
By paulgspence on 12 Aug 2010 ![]()
What you can do, is purchase something like an IronKey, put your secure details such as email adresses with passwords etc into this device. Update it as and when you join something. Then when you create a will, make sure that you leave details on how to access the device inside the will. As long as your will is kept in a secured area then that would do.
By _delp_ on 12 Aug 2010 ![]()
Ah.. ok the IronKey will do the job But won't you need two as you will need to keep the password of the firt IronKey safe... Hang on you will need three, no my mistake four...or is it five
By neillbrooks on 12 Aug 2010 ![]()
A will should always be kept somewhere safe and should never be opened until your death. So providing you do that you're fine. Their are many options that you could use for secure storage of your will.
By _delp_ on 12 Aug 2010 ![]()
TYNT is for goons
You nudnicks! I can't even copy and paste the title of this article into my Twitter client because TYNT's appended garbage causes it to exceed 140 characters.
Please throw TYNT into the trash where it belongs!
http://daringfireball.net/2010/05/tynt_copy_paste_
jerks
By MacSmiley on 12 Aug 2010 ![]()
What I would do
When my mum died (pre-internet; at least she was) I sent cards to everyone in her addressbook - who reads obituaries, anyway?
Now, as executor, I would hope to get speedy access to social media accounts, change the status to "deceased", and give details of funeral arrangements, memorials etc.
Later I would consider the question of deleting or archiving the account.
Just because someone has died, doesn't mean their social status should be frozen or killed.
Regarding Ironkey etc., I agree - a sealed envelope kept with a will or otherwise, marked "in the event of death", could give access to passwords.
By adaviel on 12 Aug 2010 ![]()
Another consideration of dead account owners
Another consideration is what excessive numbers of dead members will do to social media metrics. It's already difficult to establish statistics on social media usage in relationship to traditional population measures, so having mortality mixed in complicates measurement even further. See: http://www.ddmcd.com/mortality.html
By ddmcd on 12 Aug 2010 ![]()
Why no photographs?
Our son was killed in a road accident last year. His facebook page has provided a place for family and friends to share memories. However, we would have like to have been able to add photographs, which isn't possible once the account is memorialised. Not a big issue, just something that surprised us when we noticed it.
By smithdom on 12 Aug 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
advertisement
