Google casts doubt on click fraud findings
By Matt Whipp
Posted on 9 Aug 2006 at 15:24
Google has warned its AdWords customers to take the findings of click fraud specialists with a pinch of salt.
It says that many audits of click fraud data are performed using flawed metrics and that many reports over-inflate estimates of the extent of the problem.
Shuman Ghosemajumder, Google's Business Product Manager for Trust & Safety, claimed that 'many click fraud consultants don't count actual ad clicks'.
'The consultants count page reloads and subsequent visits on an advertiser's site as multiple clicks on the advertiser's Google ad. This generates fictitious ad clicks in the consultant's reports.'
Additionally, it is alleged that the methodologies used count clicks for all monitored advertising networks and then attribute them all to each network.
'One often-used consultant implements the cookie in such a way that clicks on Yahoo! ads can be counted as clicks on Google ads, and vice versa,' it is claimed.
Additionally, some consultants are even reporting genuine clicks as fictitious or fraudulent clicks, with evidence that these have a conversion rate of greater than 5 per cent.
Such is the extent of the problem that Google claims some figures quoted for click fraud are 50 per cent greater than the same figures it has in its own log files.
Its report on third-party click fraud auditing by Google's 'Click Quality Team' looked into reports from leading click fraud specialists AdWatcher, ClickFacts, and Click Forensics, saying 'all of the reports we've seen from these consultants exhibit the serious problems we have described'.
The click fraud issue is a high profile one for Google. In March, retailer Lane's Gifts won $90 million in legal fees and compensation in a class action suit against Google for click fraud, although a subsequent investigation found Google's approach to the problem 'reasonable'.
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
- 20 years of PC Pro: our greatest review mistakes
- 20 years of PC Pro: our first A-List
- Wikipedia's "right to be forgotten" protest hits the wrong note
- 3D printing hits the high street for plastic selfies
- 20 years of PC Pro: What amazed us in our first issue
- How Google Glass ruined my lunch hour
- Smartphone battery packs: can a USB power pack beat the festival battery blues?
- Windows Easy Transfer – not so "easy" in Windows 8.1
- Formula 1: what a difference virtualisation makes
- Office of the future: comfy chairs and tablets everywhere
- 10 ways to make your business more secure
- Top five VoIP mistakes
- How to add in-app purchasing to an iPhone, Android or Windows app
- Remote-control ransomware: TeamViewer and software hardball
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy