Google casts doubt on click fraud findings
By Matt Whipp
Posted on 9 Aug 2006 at 15:24
Google has warned its AdWords customers to take the findings of click fraud specialists with a pinch of salt.
It says that many audits of click fraud data are performed using flawed metrics and that many reports over-inflate estimates of the extent of the problem.
Shuman Ghosemajumder, Google's Business Product Manager for Trust & Safety, claimed that 'many click fraud consultants don't count actual ad clicks'.
'The consultants count page reloads and subsequent visits on an advertiser's site as multiple clicks on the advertiser's Google ad. This generates fictitious ad clicks in the consultant's reports.'
Additionally, it is alleged that the methodologies used count clicks for all monitored advertising networks and then attribute them all to each network.
'One often-used consultant implements the cookie in such a way that clicks on Yahoo! ads can be counted as clicks on Google ads, and vice versa,' it is claimed.
Additionally, some consultants are even reporting genuine clicks as fictitious or fraudulent clicks, with evidence that these have a conversion rate of greater than 5 per cent.
Such is the extent of the problem that Google claims some figures quoted for click fraud are 50 per cent greater than the same figures it has in its own log files.
Its report on third-party click fraud auditing by Google's 'Click Quality Team' looked into reports from leading click fraud specialists AdWatcher, ClickFacts, and Click Forensics, saying 'all of the reports we've seen from these consultants exhibit the serious problems we have described'.
The click fraud issue is a high profile one for Google. In March, retailer Lane's Gifts won $90 million in legal fees and compensation in a class action suit against Google for click fraud, although a subsequent investigation found Google's approach to the problem 'reasonable'.
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
- Tim Cook: this is how much TV has changed since the 70s
- Westminster wins the .London battle
- 20 years of PC Pro: from deep pan pizza to virtualisation
- Five reasons why the Apple Watch leaves me cold
- Apple Watch, iPhone 6 and 6 Plus: Tim Cook's Apple back with a bang?
- BT Home Hub 5: how to get maximum speed
- 20 years of PC Pro: one-star reviews (including "the worst tablet we've ever seen")
- 20 years of PC Pro: our best covers
- Why we've closed the PC Pro forums
- How to turn off Google Location Tracking
- How to sell more ebooks on Amazon
- 10 ways to make your business more secure
- Top five VoIP mistakes
- How to add in-app purchasing to an iPhone, Android or Windows app
- Remote-control ransomware: TeamViewer and software hardball
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office