Senate turns down Net neutrality provision
Posted on 30 Jun 2006 at 11:57
Attempts to glue on terms to ensure Net neutrality to upcoming legislation were dealt another blow after it failed under debate in the US Senate.
The issue rests on allowing network companies to charge extra for high-priority access to their networks. Opponents of the notion object that it would change the open nature of the Internet, allowing those with the most money to ensure their services get a preferred status.
The Senate vote Wednesday was split down the middle with 11 on each side. The neutrality provision needs a majority to pass, and so it wasn't taken up at this point.
The vote was also split politically: the only Republican voting for the amendment was Olympia J. Snowe, who co-authored the amendment, but all the Democrats put forward a yes vote.
The Communications Opportunity, Promotion, and Enhancement Act of 2006, which the Net neutrality amendment is trying to annex, did gain approval and will move to the next stage in its passage: a full Senate vote.
Proponents of Net neutrality such as the It's Our Net Coalition claimed the tie 'clearly underscores the Senate Commerce Committee's discomfort with abandoning rules that until now have ensured an open, innovative and competitive Internet marketplace.
'We are confident that Congress will ultimately do the right thing for consumers, competition and the future of the Internet by ensuring that Net Neutrality prevails and that the Internet remains the remarkable open marketplace for ideas and innovation that it is today.'
The likes of Google, Microsoft, Amazon and others are backing the Net neutrality campaign, with Google's CEO Eric Schmidt calling on users to support the amendment. Sir Tim Berners-Lee has also spoken out in favour of Net neutrality.
See also
US votes against Net neutrality
Google CEO makes call to action over Net Neutrality
US votes to preserve Net neutrality
Author: Matt Whipp
advertisement
- Microsoft shows courage at Tech-Ed 09
- PowerPoint and Silverlight: a perfect match?
- Why all the fuss over Windows Explorer?
- Your iPhone has a virus? Well it's your fault
- Motorola pays Lucas for its Droid
- Where are the killer apps for Windows?
- Will you hit the Orange iPhone "unlimited" cap?
- USB 3 first benchmark - it's here, and it's fast
- Why Windows 7 has forced me to worry about security
- How Dixons is (under)selling Windows 7
- The bulletproof Dell that costs an arm and a leg
- Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Preview: Q&A
- Lawnmowers, the TyTN II and one odd insurance request
- There'll never be a bulletproof OS
- How far can we trust apps?
- Five nice touches in Outlook 2010
- Building a better Google
- Beware HP's horrendous printer-driver glitch
- Microsoft debuts free Morro antivirus package
- Getting started with Search Server 2008 Express
advertisement

Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk
