W3C issues mobile guidelines
Posted on 28 Jun 2006 at 10:28
The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) has issued a 'candidate recommendation' for a set of basic guidelines for Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0. The document is backed by over 30 organisations, including many of the companies involved in the development of the Internet on mobile devices - AOL, the International Webmasters Association / HTML Writers Guild (IWA-HWG), Internet Content Rating Association, Microsoft, Vodafone, Nokia, Google, dotMobi and France Telecom, among others.
Following the founding principles of the World Wide Web, the document attempts to provide HTML coders with a set of basic rules so that web pages can be viewed on as diverse a set of mobile platforms as possible, including mobile phones.
However, as the Web was originally designed for desktop computers, coding for mobile devices provides a new set of challenges. The most obvious problem being that the average display on a mobile device is much smaller than that of the standard desktop or notebook computer. There are also issues with user input and interaction and bandwidth all of which need to be addressed.
Because the standard aspires to 'one Web' that is, pages should as far as possible be device independent, the document sets some basic standards for a web page delivered to a mobile device. These include the ability to be seen on a 120pixel wide screen as a minimum, JPG and GIF as the accepted graphics formats, a maximum page weight of 20K and XHTML - Basic Profile, External CSS Level 1 support and HTTP 1.0 or 1.1.
The document also provides a lot of practical advice such as not using cookies, keeping URLs short and steering clear of pop-ups and auto refreshing pages as many devices cannot support more than one window.
The W3C also plans to provide a guidelines checker to test results and a wiki to provide a forum for issues and suggestions to improve the guidelines in the future.
The Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 is available at the W3C web site.
Author: Steve Malone
advertisement
- ATI Radeon HD 5970: 42% more expensive in the UK
- Office 2010 Beta – 32-bit or 64-bit – The Choice is Clear
- Why Britain's watchdogs have fewer teeth than goldfish
- Tabbed documents: how to make Office 2010 great
- Outlook 2010 People Pane – does it spell death to Xobni
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots
- Co-Authoring in Word 2010 and SharePoint Foundation 2010
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots: Backstage view
- Flash 10.1: Developing for Desktop and Device
- Microsoft Office 2010 screenshots: Recover unsaved items
- Getting to grips with Microsoft's IT Health Environment Scanner
- Virtualise your servers
- The changing face of travel gadgets
- Build your own distributed file system
- The bulletproof Dell that costs an arm and a leg
- Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Preview: Q&A
- Lawnmowers, the TyTN II and one odd insurance request
- There'll never be a bulletproof OS
- How far can we trust apps?
- Five nice touches in Outlook 2010
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

