W3C issues mobile guidelines
By Steve Malone
Posted on 28 Jun 2006 at 10:28
The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) has issued a 'candidate recommendation' for a set of basic guidelines for Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0. The document is backed by over 30 organisations, including many of the companies involved in the development of the Internet on mobile devices - AOL, the International Webmasters Association / HTML Writers Guild (IWA-HWG), Internet Content Rating Association, Microsoft, Vodafone, Nokia, Google, dotMobi and France Telecom, among others.
Following the founding principles of the World Wide Web, the document attempts to provide HTML coders with a set of basic rules so that web pages can be viewed on as diverse a set of mobile platforms as possible, including mobile phones.
However, as the Web was originally designed for desktop computers, coding for mobile devices provides a new set of challenges. The most obvious problem being that the average display on a mobile device is much smaller than that of the standard desktop or notebook computer. There are also issues with user input and interaction and bandwidth all of which need to be addressed.
Because the standard aspires to 'one Web' that is, pages should as far as possible be device independent, the document sets some basic standards for a web page delivered to a mobile device. These include the ability to be seen on a 120pixel wide screen as a minimum, JPG and GIF as the accepted graphics formats, a maximum page weight of 20K and XHTML - Basic Profile, External CSS Level 1 support and HTTP 1.0 or 1.1.
The document also provides a lot of practical advice such as not using cookies, keeping URLs short and steering clear of pop-ups and auto refreshing pages as many devices cannot support more than one window.
The W3C also plans to provide a guidelines checker to test results and a wiki to provide a forum for issues and suggestions to improve the guidelines in the future.
The Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 is available at the W3C web site.
From around the web
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
