ICANN votes down .xxx domain
By Steve Malone
Posted on 12 May 2006 at 10:32
The body governing the top level domains of the Internet ICANN has rejected the proposal for an .xxx top level domain. The Board of Directors voted 9-5 against the proposal from the ICM Registry - a Florida based company set up for the purpose of lobbying for the domain.
The .xxx domain has been on the table at ICANN for a number of years. However, the proposal to create the .xxx domain for the sex industry has been a hot potato that ICANN has deferred on a number of occasions leading to speculation that the Republican White House and right wing 'family' groups have been putting pressure on ICANN to refuse the proposal.
Conservatives say that to create the .xxx domain would 'legitimise' the creation of a virtual red light district on the Internet. Supporters of the domain say that such a move would make it easier to filter out 'adult' content and prevent it from being viewed by minors - something the Bush administration has been attempting for several years. The conservative lobbying groups counter that the .xxx domain would merely result in a land grab for the pornography industry and there was no indication that the organisations behind Internet porn would give up their .com and .net addresses.
ICANN says that political pressure played no part in the final decision and instead the board focussed on the areas of sponsorship, compliance issues and public policy concerns. However, others see the hand of the Bush administration in the rejection of the proposal.
The US Department of Commerce would have to approve any changes in the top level domain registry. Speaking to Reuters news agency, Martin Selmayr, the spokesman for EU Information Society and Media Commissioner, Viviane Reding said 'We see here a first clear case of political interference in ICANN' and called the development 'worrying'.
Oddly enough this puts the liberal EU on the same side as states such as Saudi Arabia, China and Iran. Last year, these countries argued that the US should relinquish control of ICANN because it was being used a tool of American foreign policy and should put it in the hands of an international body.
From around the web
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
