News
[PSUs]| Thursday 23rd February 2006 |
Kasperky's Costin Raiu, Head of Research & Development, writes in the report 'Internet Attacks 2005' that the buffer overrun vulnerability discovered in SQL Server 2000 back in 2002 was the most used vector for attack last year.
The three-year-old Slammer Internet worm exploits this flaw and was the fourth most prevalent attack or probe of 2005. Other attacks exploiting this flaw came seventh. The Blaster worm of 2003 placed twelfth, while other attacks using the same RPC exploit were tenth.
To put that in context, by far the most prevalent attack was the HTTP GET probe, accounting for nearly a third of all attacks and probes. This is most often used by spammers to identify open proxies on the Internet which can subsequently be used to send spam.
But the presence of Slammer can largely be put down to the inexorable rise of China as an Internet super-power. With a reported 94m people online, Raiu writes that 'China hosts 57 per cent of the machines infected by Slammer, while Korea, which used to lead in this respect two years ago, now has less than 1 per cent of all infected machines.'
Indeed
ADVERTISEMENT |
|
He says the rest of the world is beginning to wake up to the security threat, with users quickly applying patches when made available. 'Recent campaigns to raise awareness of IT security issues are either having a palpable effect (mainly in the US) or being completely ignored in countries such as China,' he writes.
For 2006, he predicts new viruses able to exploit multiple vulnerabilities, but the main thrust of virus activity he expects to continue to revolve around spamming.
The report was compiled using Kaspersky's global network of 'Smallpots', designed to monitor Internet attacks of all types and which can measure not only the port number, but the actual data sent during the attack.
This, says Raiu, is more accurate than other methods of measuring attacks. 'A lot of the statistics which are made available on the Internet are calculated using reports provided by firewall software, in the form of TCP/IP port numbers which have been blocked,' he says. 'They do not provide an exact picture of what malware has been used and they are not able to differentiate between the various exploits used by hackers to break into remote systems over the Internet.'
Submit to: Digg | Slashdot | Del.icio.us | Technorati


