Storm erupts over new Hotmail anti-spam safety bar
Posted on 24 Jun 2005 at 11:23
Microsoft is introducing a new 'safety bar' in its Hotmail accounts to warn customers that the email they have received may be spam. However, the move is seen by many as a way of Microsoft forcing companies to adopt its Sender ID technology.
Hotmail accounts are one of the prime targets for spammers and Microsoft has been trying to come up with solution to prevent spam clogging up the internet.
Microsoft's preferred solution is the Sender ID Framework (SIDF). Sender ID is designed to tackle one of the biggest problems in combating spam - address spoofing. Spammers never use their own address.
Sender ID uses technology originally designed to inform a sender that an email has 'bounced' - the system checks the contents of an email by checking that it came from the stated envelope sender. Domains known as spam sources are simply blocked. For the system to fully work ISPs and other companies with mail servers need to publish an Sender Policy Framework (SPF) certificate to identify their mail servers.
Microsoft says the Hotmail safety bar will 'alert customers to potential deceptive e-mail messages'. However, these will include any mail without an SPF record. Now many email marketers fear that without an SPF, their mail will automatically be flagged as spam.
Previous attempts to get industry wide adoption of Sender ID have not gone smoothly. Although submitted to the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) as a proposed standard, the body could not agree to its adoption. The main sticking point being that certain key parts of the code remained as part of Microsoft's intellectual property. Many were concerned that an internet wide adoption would mean Microsoft proprietary code alongside the SPF on every mail server in the world.
Nevertheless, Microsoft is pressing on, In an interview Craig Spiezle, a director in the Technology Care and Safety group at Microsoft, said, 'Getting businesses and e-mail users to recognize the importance and urgency surrounding e-mail authentication technologies is half the battle. The industry continues to encourage ISPs and businesses to publish an SPF record to protect their domain and ultimately enhance their brand name.'
Author: Steve Malone
advertisement
- Need a bit of extra Christmas cash? Grass up your boss, says BSA
- Photoshop Mobile on Android review: first look
- ATI Radeon HD 5970: 42% more expensive in the UK
- Office 2010 Beta – 32-bit or 64-bit – The Choice is Clear
- Why Britain's watchdogs have fewer teeth than goldfish
- Tabbed documents: how to make Office 2010 great
- Outlook 2010 People Pane – does it spell death to Xobni
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots
- Co-Authoring in Word 2010 and SharePoint Foundation 2010
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots: Backstage view
- Getting to grips with Microsoft's IT Health Environment Scanner
- Virtualise your servers
- The changing face of travel gadgets
- Build your own distributed file system
- The bulletproof Dell that costs an arm and a leg
- Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Preview: Q&A
- Lawnmowers, the TyTN II and one odd insurance request
- There'll never be a bulletproof OS
- How far can we trust apps?
- Five nice touches in Outlook 2010
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

