MGM vs Grokster case moves to the Supreme Court
By Steve Malone
Posted on 30 Mar 2005 at 11:47
The two sides in the bitter dispute over whether peer to peer networking is responsible for illegal file sharing final met at the Supreme Court today. The long running battle between MGM, which represents the movie business, and Grokster and StreamCast Networks, for the p2p companies, seeks to settle once and for all whether peer to peer technology encourages illegal activity.
So far the battle has been a 2-0 victory for the file sharers. Both the circuit court and the appeals court found in favour of the p2p networks. Their judgements were based on an original 1984 ruling where Sony was cleared of promoting copyright infringement because some people used its video cassette recorders to duplicate copyright material. Ironically, Sony as one of the world's largest music labels is now on the side of the copyright owners.
Early indications are that the Supreme Court is likely to go along with its 1984 decision. A ban on any device which could theoretically be used to infringe copyright would include a long line of technological innovations including VCRs, audio cassettes, iPods, fax machines and photocopiers. Justice Stephen G. Breyer said that while p2p software could be used to steal copyrighted material, he considered that the technology had 'some really excellent uses'.
Musicians themselves seem split down the middle on the subject. On the one hand are artists as diverse as Sheryl Crow, the Dixie Chicks, Dr Dre and Metallica who claim that free music would ruin the business and destroy their livelihoods.
Others such as Courtney Love, Moby, Brian Eno and Public Enemy's Chuck D have all come out in support of file-sharing technology. Their argument is that file sharing allows their music to reach a wider audience outside of the control of the record industry.
Other technology vendors such as the Consumer Electronics Association and Intel have also asked that the Supreme Court does not limit the freedom to innovate through fear of misuse of a technology. While neither of these organisations feels comfortable with some of the characters behind some of the p2p services, they see the judgement as having a decisive effect on consumer electronics development for decades to come.
Likewise, the copyright holders would like to see consumer electronics companies acting more responsibly and considering what effect their inventions have on others before developing and marketing them.
If MGM wins the music business would use the judgement to drive the p2p networks out of business by claiming billions of dollars in damages and lost revenues. If Grokster and StreamCast win, then swapping copyright files would still be illegal - that part of the law is not in doubt. However, the music and movie businesses would have to continue their current expensive and damaging, from a PR view, pursuit of individual file swappers.
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
- Hello Cortana, it's nice to meet you
- Windows 8.1 Update: an abject surrender
- The insane economics of Sky Now TV
- No such thing as a free app... so pay up if you want quality
- Time to outlaw crapware-laden installers
- Windows Phone 8.1 video: hands-on
- Office for iPad: key information
- Why every PC buyer owes Richard Durkin a debt of gratitude
- HTC One M8 vs Samsung Galaxy S5: 2014's big-hitters compared
- Windows XP end of life: key information
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- Raspberry Pi and Wolfram: a must-have for every child
- Could you get by with Office Web Apps?
- The best Android antivirus apps for 2014
- Headings vs headers: how to use both in Word