CLARIFICATION: AOL Instant messenger users 'waive right to privacy'

Posted on 14 Mar 2005 at 12:34

AOL has contacted us to refute the claims that users' privacy was 'waived'

A spokesperson for the company said that the changes apply 'only to content posted on public spaces ... such as messageboards and public chatrooms'.

'We do not read member to member communication,' he reiterated.

He said the story had blown up from a 'misinterpretation' of comments made in a blog and that the changes in question were made more than a year ago.

He said that such terms were standard provisions for many websites and that it allows such sites to publish user reactions to news stories, for example. However, AOL would only reuse comments posted in areas of AOL that were already public. 'We do not read or monitor [personal chat],' he insisted.

The original story follows:

The terms and conditions for AIM allow AOL to reuse personal content for any purpose it wishes.

At the time of writing, there is no word from AOL as to what it might mean for its business users. Although the company abandoned its IM for business product last year, it still promotes the AOL@Work product which offers things like voice conferencing to companies. Presumably, these corporations will be less than pleased if any of there sensitive material turns up in AOL marketing literature. Even so, many ordinary people use AIM to conduct private and often very personal conversations. They will be unhappy that AOL allows itself to monitor the traffic let alone reserve the right to broadcast it throughout the world.

Author: Steve Malone