Skip to navigation

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Latest News

Advertising Standards knocks Vodafone's 'free calls' ad

Posted on 12 Jan 2005 at 12:12

Tiscali's dig at a Vodafone TV commercial has won the backing of the Adverts Standards Authority (ASA), which has found the mobile operator in breach of the CAP (Broadcast) Television Advertising Standards Code.

The advert in question was set in a bakery where the manager was receiving a number of trivial calls, with the voice over proclaiming 'Like most small firms, we have to make dozens of absolutely vital calls everyday'...

What Tiscali objected to was use of the word 'free' when the advert claimed 'Those mobile calls we make to the people we work with, wouldn't it help if they were free? With Vodafone Perfect Fit For Business, they are. Vodafone. Free calls between your company mobiles'. According to Tiscali, the claim was misleading because the price of the calls was included in the monthly fee charged as part of Vodafone's Perfect Fit for Business price plan.

The complaint was upheld by the ASA, which considered that internal calls between company
mobiles were 'inclusive' rather than 'free', so it concluded that the claim was misleading.

The ASA been moved to dispose on the meaning of 'free'. Broadcast code rules had, until now, been interpreted to allow use of the word free to describe elements of a package - for example an Internet service - that are included for an overall sum of money but for which no extra charge is made.

Following the Vodafone ruling, however, the interpretation will change. It will be acceptable to say there is no additional cost to the customer for a package-element that is included in the package price, but not that the element is free.

For television ads, it declares: 'Advertisements must not describe an offer as 'free' if there are costs to consumers other than actual postage or carriage, non-premium rate telephone charges or reasonable travel required to collect the offer. Advertising must make clear the extent of the consumer's liability for any costs.'

You can read the full ruling in a PDF on the ASA website.

Author: Alun Williams

Be the first to comment this article

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

advertisement

Most Commented News Stories
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Reviews Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2008