UPDATED: Microsoft denied patent for FAT filing system
By Steve Malone
Posted on 30 Sep 2004 at 14:29
Microsoft has lost the first round in the battle to patent the FAT filing system used in DOS and which formed the basis of the disk management system of early versions of Windows.
The US Patent and Trademark Office decided in a review of the patent granted to Microsoft in 1996 that it did not differ sufficiently from the work of other programmers to merit legal protection.
The challenge to the 1996 patent was mounted in April of this year by the Public Patent Foundation (Pubpat) after Microsoft began to start collecting royalties on the patent. Whilst these were considered token, it was feared that the patent could be used to restrict the development of open source projects which rely on FAT technology.
As part of the adjudication process, Pubpat introduced as evidence several items of 'prior art' which predated the Microsoft patent. The Patent Office decided, that based on the evidence of previous work, the basis of the Microsoft patent 'would have been obvious at the time....to a person having ordinary skill in the art'.
'The Patent Office has simply confirmed what we already knew for some time now, Microsoft's FAT patent is bogus,' claimed Dan Ravicher, Pubpat's Executive Director. 'I hope those companies that chose to take a licence from Microsoft for the patent negotiated refund clauses so that they can get their money back.'
However, Microsoft doesn't see this as the end of the matter. The company told us `This latest action by the PTO is just one step in a long process. The PTO has not revoked the patent, it has simply put the claims in question and requested Microsoft to provide arguments supporting our initial claims or amending our claims. We are looking forward to having our first opportunity to weigh in with Microsoft's side of the story.`
From around the web
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
