MS pressured to quit delaying and comply with antitrust settlement
By Matt Whipp
Posted on 4 Jul 2003 at 11:35
The US Justice Department has reported to a federal judge that it is 'concerned' with the way Microsoft is dragging its heels in complying with terms of the antitrust settlement.
In particular, the Microsoft Communications Protocol Program (MCPP) is the thorny issue. The program was designed to 'license certain Communications Protocols on reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms' and 'in a timely manner' - in fact within three months of the settlement - and for the purpose of 'unfettering the market and restoring competition'.
The MCPP IP licensing program gives third parties access to the necessary bits of Microsoft code needed to ensure rival software can interact properly with Microsoft server products and thus compete effectively with Microsoft's own 'middleware'.
However, the Department is unhappy about the royalty structure and rates proposed by Microsoft, as well as the the time Microsoft is taking to implement agreed changes, and is recommendng 'that further steps may need to be taken... to account for Microsoft's delayed implementation.'
Indeed the report points out that in the text of the antitrust settlement itself, the importance of having these terms met quickly is vital - otherwise 'it is quite possible that the core of the decree would prove prematurely obsolete.'
Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler said, 'Microsoft has complied with the settlement, but is open to considering additional feedback from government and industry.
'We've worked together and made some initial changes to this complex and unprecedented program and we will continue to work together.'
As recently as April, the US Justice Department had negotiated less stringent terms for potential licensees on the MCPP, reducing costs and removing NDAs tied to even viewing some of the documentary information.
But since then and ongoing today, the Justice Department has received numerous complaints about the way Microsoft is carrying out its obligations under the settlement. Even now it is investigating eighteen 'substantive complaints' of 'specific allegations' that 'require a longer time frame'. The Department's next report is due on 24 July.
See also
From around the web
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
