SOAP 1.2 becomes a W3C Recommendation
By Alun Williams
Posted on 26 Jun 2003 at 12:56
The W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) has issued a new standard for communicating data over the Internet - the specification for SOAP 1.2.
Backed by the likes of Microsoft and IBM, SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) uses use XML to present the 'logic' of data across the communication networks. For example, it is used by Web-based applications to encode 'object' of information, such as identity information, car specifications, data records and any other logical grouping of data
'Web services make good on the promise of interoperable applications only when the technical foundations are shared, robust, and achieve expected performance,' said W3C Director, Tim Berners-Lee. 'Today, W3C Members have endorsed SOAP Version 1.2, the first version of SOAP to have undergone rigorous testing and implementation, and to support a full complement of Web standards. Web services customers and developers alike demand an XML-based Web services protocol that powers the full range of applications and Web technologies they can imagine using. Now that SOAP Version 1.2 is here, they have it.'
As well as removing ambiguities from version 1.1, the new standard deals with issues of messaging frameworks and remote procedure calls, and further builds on XML technologies. In particular, SOAP Version 1.2 is designed to work seamlessly with W3C XML schemas - this will pave the way for further work on the Web Services Description Language (WSDL).
A status of 'Recommendation' for a specification means that the W3C favours its adoption by the industry.
The Recommendation is based around four documents: the SOAP Version 1.2 Primer, SOAP Version 1.2
Messaging Framework , SOAP Version 1.2
Adjuncts and the SOAP Version 1.2
Assertions and Test Collection.
From around the web
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
