Mozilla grudgingly adopts DRM support in Firefox
By Jane McCallion
Posted on 15 May 2014 at 09:23
All future editions of Firefox will include digital rights management (DRM) technology, Mozilla has announced, even though it disagrees with Encrypted Media Extensions (EME) on principle.
The company has “little choice” but to implement the technology, as “most competing browsers and the content industry [are] embracing the W3C EME specification”, according to a blog post by Andreas Gal, Mozilla’s CTO.
Mozilla, along with the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), has been protesting against the incorporation of EME into the specifications for HTML5 by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).
While the organisation isn’t against DRM per se, it has argued that the majority of systems, including EME, are “overly burdensome for users” and can restrict even lawful use of content, such as buying a film on one device and trying to watch it on another.
It also disagrees with the fact EME uses proprietary code, which Mozilla is against on principle as an open source foundation.
However, some of the biggest content providers on the web - including Netflix, Microsoft and Google - have put their weight behind EME, leaving Mozilla no choice but to include it in all upcoming versions of Firefox.
“Mozilla would have preferred to see the content industry move away from locking content to a specific device … and worked to provide alternatives,” Gal said.
“We have come to the point where Mozilla not implementing the W3C EME specification means that Firefox users have to switch to other browsers to watch content restricted by DRM… which can make up more than 30% of the downstream traffic in North America,” he said.
Danny O’Brien, international director of the EFF, disagreed. “Mozilla and the W3C are both organisations with missions intended to defend and promote the open web. Both have now committed to a system of content control that is seen as a violation of those principles by many internet users.”
“We need to challenge the baseless assertion that users don't mind DRM as long as they can watch House of Cards and … given the amount of compromise we have already suffered, we need to spell out the principles that we won't compromise on,” he concluded.
A while back I had trouble trying to watch something on Amazon Prime on my PC because it didn't like my multi-monitor setup.
That used silverlight so I wonder how this DRM compares to that and whether it's as platform restricted.
By tech3475 on 15 May 2014
- How to get the Windows 10 Technical Preview, plus release date, features and latest news
- Why the Microsoft Band could be a game changer
- Windows 10 trackpad shortcuts: Microsoft takes a leaf out of Apple's book
- Internet tax: what it is and why it failed
- HP's vision for the future of PCs: the 3D Sprout
- Google Glass: mugger bait, pub problem and other lessons learned from two dangerous weeks
- Twitter, please don't fiddle with my feed
- How Satya Nadella can get some pay-raise karma
- Windows 10: a step back to go forward
- Michael Dell: Cloud infrastructure is the roads, bridges and highways of the 21st century
- How to check your identity hasn’t been sold to the hackers
- Tim Cook: this is how much TV has changed since the 70s
- Westminster wins the .London battle
- 20 years of PC Pro: from deep pan pizza to virtualisation
- Five reasons why the Apple Watch leaves me cold
- How to sell more ebooks on Amazon
- 10 ways to make your business more secure
- Top five VoIP mistakes
- How to add in-app purchasing to an iPhone, Android or Windows app
- Remote-control ransomware: TeamViewer and software hardball
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office