Google yanks Chrome extensions serving ads
By Shona Ghosh
Posted on 20 Jan 2014 at 10:57
Google has pulled two Chrome browser extensions after they began spamming users with ads, breaching the company's policy.
The company has removed "Add to Feedly" and "Tweet This Page" from the Chrome web store after users complained that both extensions silently served them ads while using the browser.
Add to Feedly allowed users to add any RSS feed on the web page they were browsing to the Feedly reader. The second extension allowed users to share pages to Twitter.
Both were originally built by independent developers and sold off to third parties after amassing thousands of users.
The new owners then quietly introduced updates which meant the extensions began serving ads without asking the user's permission - resulting in lower user ratings and complaints.
Using a Chrome extension to inject more ads into web pages is against Google's policies, but appears to be difficult to police.
Extensions can update in the background and, in some cases, introduce new features without asking the user's permission. It can also be difficult to connect the dots between an influx of ads and a malicious extension.
The developer behind Add to Feedly, Amit Agarwal, sold his extension off after being offered "four figures".
But he found the extension had been subsequently updated to alter normal links to affiliate links. "In simple English, if the extension is activated in Chrome, it will inject adware into all web pages," he said.
Agarwal said it had been a "mistake" to sell Add to Feedly, and apologised to the extension's existing users.
Meanwhile, Tweet this Page began hijacking Google web searches after being sold, according to an Ars Technica report.
Buying up users
Several other developers have come forward claiming to have been courted by data-focused buyers.
The developer of discount service Honey, George Ruan, said malware vendors, adware developers and data collection companies had all been interested in his company's user base. The Chrome extension has almost 270,000 users.
"[One] data collection company did throw a dollar figure our way. It's over six figures a month," he said. He added that doing anything "shady" would kill user trust.
Google has yet to issue any advice on avoiding malicious extensions, though it's possible to end the problem simply by removing the add-on.
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
No checking on updates by Google?
Worrying that Google does not check the extension updates before they are released. These extensions were caught because they spammed the users with ads. What if this wasn’t ads? What if the extensions were changed to do something more malicious? Google would not know and the users may not know. They are creating a new ecosystem but failing to monitor it.
Android already has a reputation of being more unsafe than iOS with dodgy apps. Now Chrome extensions are heading that way as well. It shouldn’t just be “Do no evil”. It also be “Prevent others from doing evil”.
By wlm42 on 21 Jan 2014
- Getty joins the race to the bottom
- Hour of Code: five steps to learn how to code
- Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet review: first look
- Sony Xperia Z2 review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy Gear 2 review: first look
- Nokia XL review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy S5 review: first look
- Nokia X review: first look
- Censorship by copyright: Myles Powers and abuse of DMCA takedowns
- Turn an old smartphone into an in-car entertainment system
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs
- Invoices and VAT: how to set up your documents correctly
- Nexus 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S4 Active: the best phone for avoiding screen burn
- How much is a social user worth?
- The key to choosing a secure password
- Thunderbolt Bridge: a fast Mac migration tool
- Should you advertise on Twitter?
- How to track a lost smartphone
- Self-publishing success: the best way to sell your book
- 1.6TB SSD: why would you need one?