Dell 4K monitor priced at only $699
By Barry Collins
Posted on 8 Jan 2014 at 15:45
Dell plans to sell its long-awaited 4K monitor for only $699, the company has revealed at CES 2014.
Last year the company announced it would be offering the 28in "Ultra HD" P2815Q screen for less than $1,000. Now it's come in some way below that mark, with a final US price of $699, according to a report by Forbes. UK pricing wasn't available at the time of publication.
The screen has a resolution of 3,840 x 2,160 and will launch globally on 23 January.
Other specifications are currently thin on the ground, with Dell merely confirming that the screen will tilt, pivot and swivel, and that it will have multiple connections for "smartphones, tablets, laptops and PCs," without confirming exactly what they are.
Our team on the ground at CES in Las Vegas should be able to bring you more details later this week.
4K has become a theme at this year's CES: Sony yesterday unveiled an Ultra-Short-Throw Projector that can effectively turn walls into 147in 4K displays.
Netflix has also this week announced plans to stream the forthcoming series of its drama House of Cards at 4K resolution, while YouTube announced a less bandwidth-intensive technology for 4K streams.
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
The Answer is Obvious!
US pricing is $699.
UK pricing will therefore be at least £699.
All too often we have seen US$ prices become UK£ prices as soon as the goods cross "the pond".
By jontym123 on 8 Jan 2014
Can't we wait
to see what the UK pricing will actually be before moaning about the price? Remember there is the 20% "donation to the government" to take into account with UK prices.
By russell_g on 8 Jan 2014
Graphics card support?
[I think jontym1223 is getting his/her retaliation in first!]
Out of interest, how recent does a graphics card have to be to support a resolution of 3840x2160?
By JohnGray7581 on 9 Jan 2014
It needs display port at least, or HDMI 1.4. VGA and normal HDMI found on most graphics cards won't do it.
DVI-D is also not up to the task, it can theoretically drive that resolution, but at a maximum of 17hz.
Dual Link DVI can theoretically drive it at 33Hz.
I'd look to it having Display Port and HDMI 1.4, plus maybe Thunderbolt. Most Dell machines and monitors have been Display Port first for a while now.
Intel keep going on about how the BayTrail Atom can playback 4K video, although nobody has produced an Atom based PC that drives anything beyond 1080p, so I don't know how that works...
But I would guess most Core processors will be able to drive it, assuming they have DisplayPort on the motherboard.
By big_D on 9 Jan 2014
VGA should be able to do it - admittedly it won't be as good a picture as the digital-only display systems (like displayport or HDMI) but as an analogue system it should handle it.
WHUXGA can do 7680x4800, which is part of the VGA "family".
By gbjbaanb on 9 Jan 2014
- Windows 8.1 Update: an abject surrender
- The insane economics of Sky Now TV
- No such thing as a free app... so pay up if you want quality
- Time to outlaw crapware-laden installers
- Windows Phone 8.1 video: hands-on
- Office for iPad: key information
- Why every PC buyer owes Richard Durkin a debt of gratitude
- HTC One M8 vs Samsung Galaxy S5: 2014's big-hitters compared
- Windows XP end of life: key information
- Cut out the broadband jargon? What jargon?
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- Raspberry Pi and Wolfram: a must-have for every child
- Could you get by with Office Web Apps?
- The best Android antivirus apps for 2014
- Headings vs headers: how to use both in Word
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs
- Invoices and VAT: how to set up your documents correctly