Breakfast Briefing: the printer ink rip-off, Firefox cookie blocking, MP's "accidental" work porn
By Stewart Mitchell
Posted on 25 Feb 2013 at 09:25
We start the week with a look at the way printer companies charge more for less when it comes to ink, Firefox blocking third party cookies by default, how MPs are browsing porn sites "by accident" and Windows Blue's search improvements.
Printer companies "ripping off consumers"
The Guardian has looked into the murky world of printer ink supplies and claims that printer companies are taking serious liberties. While prices have remained steady the average portion of ink has dwindled dramatically across the board, the newspaper said. As an example, the Epson T032 colour cartridge released in 2002 is the same size as the Epson colour T089 from 2008, but contains just 3.5ml of ink compared to 16ml of ink in the older cartridge.
HP received the same criticism, and was also attacked for charging significantly more for larger capacity cartridges. "HP sells half-full cartridges, then sticks an 'XL' on, fills them up, and sells them for even more money," said one recycling company boss. "The difference in manufacturing costs is pennies. It's a shocking rip-off."
Firefox to block third party cookies
Mozilla has underlined that privacy is an increasingly important weapon in the battle for browser market share by blocking third-party cookies in its Firefox browser. According to The Verge, version 22 will only accept cookies from sites being visited, blocking those from ad networks unless they already have a presence on the PC. Never short on hyperbole, the online advertising industry is up in arms, calling the move a "nuclear first strike," although Safari already uses the same tactics.
MPs in another porn shocker
The Daily Mail continues its porn battle with a tale that MPs have used work computers to access adult content more than 2,500 times. The news follows earlier claims by the paper that MPs had also been visiting extra-marital dating websites, and the paper goes on to explain "gay cruising websites have also been visited a further 3,500 times along with obscure erotica sites – including one showing naked women posing with cats". One can only imagine the Google search.
The excuse given for the browser history indiscretions? MPs and their staff may have landed on the sites "accidentally".
Android as a ready-made hacking platform
Wired reports how hackers have rigged a Nexus 7 to turn it into a penetration testing tool to test network security. The Pwnie Express security firm will be selling the handheld hack machines that are based on Google’s Nexus 7 tablets for $795, but the company is also making the Pwn Pad source code available for download so it can be installed on other Android devices.
Windows Blue to feature search improvements
Windows Blue is the next iteration of Microsoft's OS and details continue to emerge about the company's plans for the upgrade. According The Verge, among the biggest changes will be closer integration with Bing for (potentially) improved search.
"The Bing team is working closely on Windows Blue to improve search in a significant way," The Verge reports. "A number of scenarios are being targeted, including the ability for users to search for a movie and have apps surface that content and provide a quick way to play it. The current implementation of search in Windows 8 supports deep search within apps, but users currently have to select those apps to search within them."
Analysis again, please
Can you do some digging into this "MP porn" story please? Rather than just repeating the Daily Mail, how about analysing it? What exactly was the data showing? Is this a single URL downloaded? Could it be that this was just some twitter linked image that was accessed via some link shortener?
Sure, there are going to be some people in all walks of society who visit this sort of site, and nothing wrong with that, just not in working hours funded by the tax payer. But was it in working hours? What if someone visits the site in their lunch break on their iPad? Is that what we are talking about?
I think that PC Pro should be more questioning about the technical information.
By MJ2010 on 25 Feb 2013 ![]()
In anticipation of the Snoopers Charter
Are the MPs just doing what they expect everyone to do when they introduce the Snoopers Charter? It will not be safe to visit websites from your own Internet connection so you have to use an Internet connection on a network where it will be harder to personally identify you.
Before they introduce the Snoopers Charter these MPs are free to look at whatever nude-people-with-cats websites they want, and nobody will bat an eyelid. Afterwards, the information will be recorded and held over them at some stage in the future.
By revsorg on 25 Feb 2013 ![]()
To be fair, if a cat-lover searches for "pussy" that site has an unfair advantage in the search rankings.
By Mark_Thompson on 25 Feb 2013 ![]()
advertisement
- Is it worth upgrading a media centre to Windows 8?
- Flickr redesign: is it enough to tempt photographers back?
- Hands on with the new Google Maps
- Nokia Lumia 925 review: first look
- Why I won't subscribe to Creative Cloud
- GoPro camera strapped to a remote-control helicopter: the ultimate boy's toy
- Acer Iconia A1 review: first look
- Acer Aspire P3 review: first look
- Acer Aspire R7 review: first look
- How we produce the PC Pro podcast
- The ICO's shame-faced u-turn on cookies
- Start8 and ModernMix: making Windows 8 work on a desktop
- How to boost your mobile reception
- How to fix Facebook: Social Fixer
- Taking the stress out of WordPress updates
- Where to download free web fonts
- Turn your tablet into a Sky+ remote control
- How to measure the success of a new IT system
- Three years on: the state of the tablet market
- Windows 8: what works and what doesn't
advertisement
