Skip to navigation
Latest News

4G auction: everyone's a winner, except the Treasury

Pound symbol

By Barry Collins

Posted on 20 Feb 2013 at 09:37

Ofcom has announced the winners of the 4G spectrum auction, but the Government has lost out to the tune of £1 billion.

All four of Britain's major mobile networks - EE, O2, Vodafone and 3 - have won a slice of spectrum, with BT also securing a segment of 2.6GHz spectrum.

However, the total amount of money raised by the auction was only £2.34 billion, just over £1 billion less than the Government's budgeted forecast of £3.5 billion.

EE, Hutchison (the parent company of 3), Telefonica (O2) and Vodafone all secured spectrum in the 800MHz band, which was freed up when analogue terrestrial television was switched off last year. The 800MHz frequencies are the most desirable since mobile signals travel further and more reliably at lower frequencies, making it cheaper and more efficient for mobile operators to role out network.

The 800MHz lot won by O2 comes with a coverage obligation that requires it to provide a mobile broadband service for indoor reception to at least 98% of the UK population and at least 95% of the population of each of the UK nations – England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales – by the end of 2017.

However, O2 was fined by Ofcom in 2008 for failing to meet its coverage obligation for 3G networks.

EE, Vodafone and BT won spectrum in the 2.6GHz band, which is best suited to high-density, urban areas.

Vodafone was the single highest bidder, paying £790m for slices of both bands. BT, at the other end of the scale, paid only £186m for its 2.6GHz spectrum.

BT's plans

BT says it has no intention of once again becoming a fully fledged mobile network - it spun off BT Cellnet in 2002, which later became O2. Instead, it will use the spectrum to deliver enhanced wireless broadband services.

"This spectrum will complement our existing strategy of delivering a range of services using fixed and wireless broadband," said BT chief executive Ian Livingston.

"We want our customers to enjoy the best possible connections wherever they are, and this spectrum – together with our investment in fibre broadband – will help us achieve that."

Auction success?

Ofcom chief executive Ed Richards said he was pleased with the outcome of the auction, even though it generated only two-thirds of the expected revenue for the Government. "This is a positive outcome for competition in the UK, which will lead to faster and more widespread mobile broadband, and substantial benefits for consumers and businesses across the country," he said. "We're confident that the UK will be among the most competitive markets in the world for 4G services."

Market watchers say the fact that all four networks got a slice of the pie means the 4G market will be as competitive as possible. "It means we probably won't see any premium on LTE in the long term," said Thomas Wehmeier, an analyst with Informa, referring to the premium tariffs offered by EE, currently Britain's only 4G network.

Wehmeier said the prices paid for spectrum were more realistic, after the £22.5 billion generated from the 3G auction in 2000. "All four [networks] got their fingers burned last time," he said.

The 4G winners

Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here
User comments

So that means 4G will be 90% cheaper?

Given that this lot of spectrum only cost 10% of what was paid for 3G we can reasonably expect a 90% reduction in costs as users of 4G....

Just kidding!

The issue of coverage is much more serious.

The ridiculous way this was and is managed by governments means that instead of a single, unified multicarrier backbone, we have a multiplicity of overlapping networks run by each of the major carriers.
The net result of this is that each of these fails to provide decent national coverage, and each is prone to serious overloading during peak demand. The net result is patchy coverage and plodding data speeds.

I see no reason to believe 4G will change any of this. Indeed my bet is that it'll be worse, because expectations will be higher.

The 'single backbone' model works pretty well for landlines (notwithstanding the growth of cable) and something similar for all mobile traffic could work even better.

A Joint Venture funded by all the players, but managed completely separately and with strict statutory obligations should do the trick....

By wittgenfrog on 20 Feb 2013

The thing about auctions is....

...they only work when there are more bidders than there are (pretty much identical) lots for sale.

By PaulOckenden on 20 Feb 2013

"All four [networks] got their fingers burned last time,"

No they didn't, they just passed on the cost to us their customers!

By AlphaGeeK on 20 Feb 2013

The government doesn't have the moral right to bloody well sell OUR airwaves to people who are going to sell them back to us.

These constitute the parties that I explicitly do not want to have my money: government and large corporations.

By Alperian on 20 Feb 2013

Given that 02 were fined for not meeting there 3G coverage obligation it was probably cheaper to pay the fine than increase coverage I can't see 4G being any different.

There's already complaints in some areas that 4G services are interfering with some digital services how is this going to be managed any by who, I can't see the mobile companies forking out for my TV service to work without interference.

By Jonchill on 20 Feb 2013

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.



Most Commented News Stories
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest ReviewsSubscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Real World Computing


Sponsored Links

Your email:

Your password:

remember me


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.