Adobe angers iOS developers with 10% Director charge
By Dave Stevenson
Posted on 14 Feb 2013 at 12:30
Adobe has angered its community of app developers with the terms and conditions attached to its Director 12 software.
The software, which is used to create apps for Apple's App Store, will now cost developers 10% of their earnings on any app which makes more than $20,000 (around £13,000).
The charge only applies to apps which make the watershed amount after Apple has taken its 30% fee per app. This means an app will actually have to make $26,000 before Adobe's charges apply.
The move has angered software developers, some of whom note that Adobe’s 10% charge comes on top of the price of buying Adobe Director, whose full version for Mac and PC cost just over £900 each. Posting on Adobe Director’s discussion forum, one user described the change as "preposterous", adding, "I will never agree to this."
"This is ridiculous," wrote another. “I realise you need to make your money back on development costs, but considering you are charging $1,000 for a new install and asking for an additional cut on top... is pretty insane."
Another user complained about the difficulty of explaining the charge to clients. "Try explaining that to a customer," they wrote. "‘Yes, we can make an app for you, but if you earn too much Adobe will take a 10% cut!' I can't imagine they would accept that, can you?"
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
Apple's 30% ok, Adobe's 10% not?
I don't see how 'developers' can complain. Adobe Director 12 is the only reason many developers can even make apps for iOS. Without it the majority of developers simply lack the basic coding knowledge to build apps, so why shouldn't Adobe get a fee for highly successful apps that wouldn't exist without Director?
By skarlock on 14 Feb 2013
Adobe's not, no
Adobe provide the tool to develop the code. Apple provide the store, payment facilities, download capacity, and general infrastructure. Adobe do a one off deliver, Apple keep supplying. They are completely different.
The good news though is that this will be resolved quite quickly. Either Adobe relent, or no one will buy the tool anyway.
By MJ2010 on 14 Feb 2013
If 10% charge is ok on Directory I guess a 10% charge on profits made with websites built using Dreamweaver?
10% profit on a photo edited in Photoshop as well perhaps?
I agree with MJ2010 Adobe supplies the tools but the don't actually do the work.
In the "real world" can you imagine builders paying 10% charge to the supplier of their tools?
By cyberindie on 14 Feb 2013
Director is much more than a 'tool' to use your builder analogy. Director is more akin to an architect who does all the complex design. Builders must pay architects a fee to design a building and then a fee for each time their plans are used for each build. In the same way, app designers who get Director to do all the complex programming they can't do themselves should expect to pay for the service if it makes them a lot of money.
By skarlock on 15 Feb 2013
- Windows 8.1 Update: an abject surrender
- The insane economics of Sky Now TV
- No such thing as a free app... so pay up if you want quality
- Time to outlaw crapware-laden installers
- Windows Phone 8.1 video: hands-on
- Office for iPad: key information
- Why every PC buyer owes Richard Durkin a debt of gratitude
- HTC One M8 vs Samsung Galaxy S5: 2014's big-hitters compared
- Windows XP end of life: key information
- Cut out the broadband jargon? What jargon?
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- Raspberry Pi and Wolfram: a must-have for every child
- Could you get by with Office Web Apps?
- The best Android antivirus apps for 2014
- Headings vs headers: how to use both in Word
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs