3's 4G won't cost more
By Nicole Kobie
Posted on 4 Feb 2013 at 09:50
The 3 network won't charge more for 4G when it rolls out its service later this year - distinguishing itself from rival EE.
"LTE, otherwise known as 4G, will be added to 3’s Ultrafast network later this year," the company said. "Unlike some other UK mobile operators, it will be available across all existing and new price plans without customers needing to pay a premium fee to upgrade."
Any customer on the network will be upgraded to 4G when it's rolled out later this year, "without paying a premium or needing to swap SIM cards or price plans".
The dig at EE is intriguing as 3's 4G services will be rolled out over the 1,800MHz spectrum that it's buying from its larger rival, offered by EE in a bid to avoid regulator scrutiny.
That will allow 3 to roll out 4G without waiting for the results of the ongoing spectrum auction, although 3 is also seeking permission from Ofcom to use its existing 2,100MHz spectrum to roll out 4G services.
The telecoms regulator is currently looking into whether it should allow EE's rivals to use existing spectrum to roll out 4G services without waiting for the auction results, with a decision expected this spring.
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
As soon as competitors arrive in the 4G market I would expect to see EE reducing prices. It's a good case study for zero competition in a market and how it leads to over-inflated prices. This is why we have to hope the likes of AMD recover their chip business otherwise Intel could charge much higher prices without competition.
By skarlock on 4 Feb 2013
What phones will work?
Is there any list of which phones will be able to use 4G when Three turns it on? I'e got a Galaxy S3 on contract with Three. So will it just "happen".
By DJ2003 on 4 Feb 2013
Reminds me of when the mobile phone networks were first starting, the UK government insisted on there being competition (with BT) and the US took IIRC a decade to sought out competition to ensure AT&T didn't have the monopoly.
That said, I wonder what their reception will be like and the speed of the rollout?
By tech3475 on 4 Feb 2013
You get what you pay for
Whilst I like the idea of an affordable 4G network, I'm very much of the belief that if you don't pay for anything, you don't value it.
It'd be nice to be proved wrong, but given my experience with Three in the past, I doubt it
By Chatan on 4 Feb 2013
- Windows 8.1 Update: an abject surrender
- The insane economics of Sky Now TV
- No such thing as a free app... so pay up if you want quality
- Time to outlaw crapware-laden installers
- Windows Phone 8.1 video: hands-on
- Office for iPad: key information
- Why every PC buyer owes Richard Durkin a debt of gratitude
- HTC One M8 vs Samsung Galaxy S5: 2014's big-hitters compared
- Windows XP end of life: key information
- Cut out the broadband jargon? What jargon?
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- Raspberry Pi and Wolfram: a must-have for every child
- Could you get by with Office Web Apps?
- The best Android antivirus apps for 2014
- Headings vs headers: how to use both in Word
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs