Ubuntu CEO: two-year releases are only "an idea"
By Barry Collins
Posted on 24 Jan 2013 at 12:24
Canonical CEO Jane Silber has told PC Pro that proposals to release a new version of Ubuntu only once every two years are merely "very, very early stage discussions".
Ubuntu has been on a six-monthly release cycle since 2004, with Long Term Support (LTS) versions of the OS being released every two years. However, Canonical developers earlier this week discussed the possibility of scrapping those interim releases, with new features being introduced in rolling updates as and when they're ready.
In an exclusive interview with PC Pro, Silber said the plans are far from concrete. "This is very, very early stage discussion. Because we do things so openly, sometimes our early stage ideas get attention in the press well before they're anywhere near a decision," she said.
The honest answer is I don't know if it's likely, because it's an idea at this point, and I think the idea merits discussion
"The honest answer is I don't know if it's likely, because it's an idea at this point, and I think the idea merits discussion."
Silber denied the proposed move was to ease the strain on Ubuntu's developers, who are now working on versions of Ubuntu for smartphones, televisions and tablets as well as the PC. "It's not so much a resource-management issue as an efficiency issue," she said.
"When we started Canonical and Ubuntu in 2004 and we said we're going to release Ubuntu every six months, the reaction was 'you guys are crazy, nobody can put out a full operating system every six months, that's just madness'."
"Remember, at the time Debian was coming out unpredictably every three to five years, Windows was coming out with many years in between - it [a six-month schedule] was unheard of. We believe we've professionalised that release process - that process of integration and getting open source communities to work together to a six-monthly release cycle.
"Now everybody does it. Fedora does it every six months, SUSE does it every six months, we showed how it could be done. Now six months seems a really long time."
Allowing developers to release new features when they're ready, rather than waiting for the traditional April and October releases, would give them greater flexibility and get those features to consumers sooner, said Silber.
"A lot of our customers who upgrade every six months would be pretty well served by a rolling release, because what they want is the latest and greatest all the time. Every time we do one of those releases, we stop doing other development work."
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
6 month releases cause lot of excitement
I always look forward to every release.
Will be happy either way.
By IndainArt on 24 Jan 2013
Could work really well
The LTS releases are great for having a stable computer which you don't have to fiddle with all the time. The only problem is that over the lifetime of the release (2 years between LTS releases and 5 years total support for each LTS) the software gets old, although they keep up with essential security updates the software, especially desktop software misses many new features and capabilities.
If they could have an LTS where at least the desktop applications (VLC, Libreoffice etc.) got updated regularly* to new versions, in the same way as they already manage Firefox, I think the whole system would become much more attractive.
It would also save Ubuntu developers tonnes of time currently spent backporting fixes, a very time consuming process which can leave users suffering from bugs a long time to wait for an official fix.
By happyskeptic on 24 Jan 2013
High time, too
Ever since first downloading Ubuntu, I would only go with an LTS. The suggested 2-year interval is exactly right in my book. From frenetic to normal, at long last.
By arichter on 31 Jan 2013
- Move over Delia: IBM Watson is cooking tonight
- Eric Schmidt on the double-edged smartphone: friend and foe
- Getty joins the race to the bottom
- Hour of Code: five steps to learn how to code
- Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet review: first look
- Sony Xperia Z2 review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy Gear 2 review: first look
- Nokia XL review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy S5 review: first look
- Nokia X review: first look
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs
- Invoices and VAT: how to set up your documents correctly
- Nexus 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S4 Active: the best phone for avoiding screen burn
- How much is a social user worth?
- The key to choosing a secure password
- Thunderbolt Bridge: a fast Mac migration tool
- Should you advertise on Twitter?
- How to track a lost smartphone
- Self-publishing success: the best way to sell your book
- 1.6TB SSD: why would you need one?