Kim Dotcom: Mega file-sharing site not "revenge"
Posted on 21 Jan 2013 at 09:46
Kim Dotcom's new file-sharing site isn't designed as revenge against authorities who took down his previous effort, Megaupload.
Dotcom said his new offering, Mega.co.nz, which launched Sunday even as he and three colleagues await extradition from New Zealand to the US, complied with the law and warned that attempts to take it down would be futile.
"This is not some kind of finger to the US government or to Hollywood," Dotcom told Reuters at his sprawling estate ahead of the Mega launch.
"Legally, there's just nothing there that could be used to shut us down. This site is just as legitimate and has the right to exist as Dropbox, Boxnet and other competitors," he said, referring to other popular cloud storage services.
This site is just as legitimate and has the right to exist as Dropbox, Boxnet and other competitors
His lawyer, Ira Rothken, added that launching the site was compliant with the terms of Dotcom's bail conditions. US prosecutors argue that Dotcom in a statement said he had no intention of starting a new internet business until his extradition was resolved.
Dotcom said Mega was a different beast to Megaupload, as the new site enables users to control exactly which users can access uploaded files, in contrast to its predecessor, which allowed users to search files, some of which contained copyrighted content allegedly without permission.
How it works
A sophisticated encryption system will allow users to encode their files before they upload them on to the site's servers, which Dotcom said were located in New Zealand and overseas.
Each file will then be issued a unique decryption key which only the file holder will control, allowing them to share the file as they choose.
As a result, the site's operators would have no access to the files, which they say would strip them from any possible liability for knowingly enabling users to distribute copyright-infringing content, which Washington says is illegal.
"Even if we wanted to, we can't go into your file and snoop and see what you have in there," Dotcom said.
Dotcom said Mega would comply with orders from copyright holders to remove infringing material, which will afford it the "safe harbor" legal provision, which minimises liability on the condition that a party acted in good faith to comply.
But some legal experts say it may be difficult to claim the protection if they do not know what users have stored.
Encryption not enough
The Motion Pictures Association of America said encrypting files alone would not protect Dotcom from liability.
"We'll reserve final judgement until we have a chance to analyse the new project," a spokesman told Reuters. "But given Kim Dotcom's history, count us as sceptical."
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
- Move over Delia: IBM Watson is cooking tonight
- Eric Schmidt on the double-edged smartphone: friend and foe
- Getty joins the race to the bottom
- Hour of Code: five steps to learn how to code
- Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet review: first look
- Sony Xperia Z2 review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy Gear 2 review: first look
- Nokia XL review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy S5 review: first look
- Nokia X review: first look
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs
- Invoices and VAT: how to set up your documents correctly
- Nexus 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S4 Active: the best phone for avoiding screen burn
- How much is a social user worth?
- The key to choosing a secure password
- Thunderbolt Bridge: a fast Mac migration tool
- Should you advertise on Twitter?
- How to track a lost smartphone
- Self-publishing success: the best way to sell your book
- 1.6TB SSD: why would you need one?