Nexus 4 shortages are Google's fault, says LG
By Stewart Mitchell
Posted on 18 Jan 2013 at 11:15
Google underestimated the demand for its Nexus 4 handset, according to an executive at LG, which manufactures the devices.
The handset sold out shortly after going on sale in several European countries, prompting speculation that Google was trying to create a buzz around the phone, but LG said Google had simply underestimated demand.
"Google had forecasts calculated according to their previous sales history of Nexus," said Cathy Robin, manager of LG's mobile division in France told business publication Challenges. "But they were much less in demand than the Nexus 4."
"Current deliveries from LG to Google correspond to what had been pre-ordered on Google Play. We continue to deliver regularly, but it's a just-in-time production," she said.
According to Robin, Google allocated ten times more phones to the UK and Germany than France, but the handsets still sold out and demand continues to outstrip production, with an increase in production taking six weeks to work through the system.
LG said production had been ramped up and that despite plans for a LG's next flagship handset – the Optimus G Pro – it expected to supply enough Nexus 4s to meet demand by mid February.
"LG has denied reports that it's going to stop production - the Nexus 4 will not stop," Robin said. "On the contrary, supply will increase. From mid-February, there won't be this pressure on the market.”
The price-to-hardware ratio of the handsets has led some commentators to speculate that the phone was being sold for a loss in a bid to bolster Google's position in the mobile device sector, but LG said that although the price was competitive it was still making money.
"We have no interest in selling at a loss," said Robin. "However, there was an agreement between Google and LG to sell it at a very attractive price - a super attractive price."
bait and switch
illegal in most markets, Google seems to be content to run a classic 'bait & switch' sales strategy - advertise at a very attractive price but only made available at much steeper contract prices. Shameful.
By martindaler on 18 Jan 2013
change the record
Google have released a quality smartphone for a resonable price. It is perfectly understandable that they should base projected demand on the previous version. The contract prices have seen are beat that of any similar phone on the market. Some people were born to degrade and tread on everything positive that comes, unfortunately there are too many of these people registered on PC Pro
By eliot94 on 18 Jan 2013
"...too many of these people..."
ad hominem attack generally a sign of a weak argument
By martindaler on 18 Jan 2013
bait and switch or unfair pricing?
It's great to have cheap phones, but if google can subsidise handsets to secure monopoly position that is not good for the market.
By longn on 19 Jan 2013
Who is doing the conning?
It does not show that Google is subsidizing their phone any more than other manufacturers.
It more likely shows how much of an overpriced product the others are selling. As Google are not known for selling at a loss it is not good business sense.
By curiousclive on 20 Jan 2013
You will find that virtually all the phones are subsidised to some extent. The mobile operators gaurentee a price base on bulk orders, then sell heavily subsidised at their stores because the real money is made on the contracts. Google are ensuring customers pays a much better real price than the store obscured subsidised price. How can a phone cost £600 when the contract price is also equivalent to this? Either phones are outrageously overpriced or very heavily subsidised. Actually it is a bit of both. It is only Google which is doing anything about this pricing and is showing consumers they do not have to pay so much. This is the only reason Apple have been forced to bring out a cheaper version of ridiculously priced tablet and is showing up the pricing for windows tablets.
By Manuel on 21 Jan 2013
- How to get the Windows 10 Technical Preview, plus release date, features and latest news
- Why the Microsoft Band could be a game changer
- Windows 10 trackpad shortcuts: Microsoft takes a leaf out of Apple's book
- Internet tax: what it is and why it failed
- HP's vision for the future of PCs: the 3D Sprout
- Google Glass: mugger bait, pub problem and other lessons learned from two dangerous weeks
- Twitter, please don't fiddle with my feed
- How Satya Nadella can get some pay-raise karma
- Windows 10: a step back to go forward
- Michael Dell: Cloud infrastructure is the roads, bridges and highways of the 21st century
- How to check your identity hasn’t been sold to the hackers
- Tim Cook: this is how much TV has changed since the 70s
- Westminster wins the .London battle
- 20 years of PC Pro: from deep pan pizza to virtualisation
- Five reasons why the Apple Watch leaves me cold
- How to sell more ebooks on Amazon
- 10 ways to make your business more secure
- Top five VoIP mistakes
- How to add in-app purchasing to an iPhone, Android or Windows app
- Remote-control ransomware: TeamViewer and software hardball
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office