Judges told to consider "viral tweets" in libel damages
By Barry Collins
Posted on 2 Jan 2013 at 08:38
The potentially "viral" effect of defamatory statements made on Twitter should be taken into account when awarding damages, the Court of Appeal has ruled.
In what could be a significant judgement for defamation cases involving social networks, the Lord Chief Justice ruled that it is fair for judges to consider whether a rumour may "go viral" when propagated on services such as Twitter.
The court was hearing an appeal involving the New Zealand cricketer, Chris Cairns, who was falsely accused of match fixing on Twitter.
Defamatory statements are objectionable not least because of their propensity to percolate through underground channels and contaminate hidden springs
The Court of Appeal was asked to consider whether it was appropriate for the judge in the case to "have had regard to the capacity for the story in question to 'go viral' via the Twitter site and the internet generally", according to a law report published in today's Times.
The Lord Chief Justice backed the judge in the Cairns case, citing a dictum that was made in an infamous defamation case brought against the BBC in 1990 - 16 years before Twitter was even founded - in which the Corporation was held liable for derogatory remarks that were repeated by newspapers.
In that Slipper vs BBC case, Lord Justice Bingham stated that "defamatory statements are objectionable not least because of their propensity to percolate through underground channels and contaminate hidden springs".
The Lord Chief Justice added that it "was obvious that today, with the ready availability of the world wide web and of social networking sites, the scale of the problem had been immeasurably enhanced, especially for libel claimants who were already, for whatever reason, in the public eye".
That ruling may give heart to Lord McAlpine, who is currently pursuing a libel action against Sally Bercow for comments made on Twitter. Ms Bercow, the wife of the speaker of the House of Commons, made reference to Lord McAlpine in a tweet shortly after he was wrongly identified as being involved in child abuse.
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
- Windows 8.1 Update: an abject surrender
- The insane economics of Sky Now TV
- No such thing as a free app... so pay up if you want quality
- Time to outlaw crapware-laden installers
- Windows Phone 8.1 video: hands-on
- Office for iPad: key information
- Why every PC buyer owes Richard Durkin a debt of gratitude
- HTC One M8 vs Samsung Galaxy S5: 2014's big-hitters compared
- Windows XP end of life: key information
- Cut out the broadband jargon? What jargon?
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- Raspberry Pi and Wolfram: a must-have for every child
- Could you get by with Office Web Apps?
- The best Android antivirus apps for 2014
- Headings vs headers: how to use both in Word