Pirate Party drops proxy after BPI legal threat
By Nicole Kobie
Posted on 19 Dec 2012 at 13:53
The Pirate Party UK has agreed to shut down a proxy to The Pirate Bay following legal action by music industry body the BPI.
Earlier this year, the BPI won a court order forcing ISPs to block access to the file-sharing site. Proxies offering access immediately popped up, including one hosted by the UK branch of the Pirate Party.
At the beginning of December, the BPI asked the Pirate Party to remove it. The political party initially refused, but has now declared it cannot afford to fight the case in court.
The law at present is clear and makes any decision to continue hosting the proxy untenable
"Despite attempts by elected members to resolve this situation, the law at present is clear and makes any decision to continue hosting the proxy untenable," said the Pirate Party's lawyer, Frances Nash of Ralli.
"This is not the outcome the party wanted however, any challenge to this proposed action would make it financially impossible for the party to deal with other issues for which they actively campaign on a daily basis," Nash added.
"The Pirate Party strongly believes that site blocking is both disproportionate and ineffective and will continue to lobby for digital rights and their wider manifesto."
At the end of last week, party leader Loz Kaye released a statement saying the BPI's legal claims were "personally directed" at six executive members of the party, rather than the party itself.
The BPI said it did write to the executives as individuals, but only because that was the only legal recourse it had. "Because the Pirate Party is not a limited company and has no form of legal personality, the proper legal course was to write to the executive members personally," the BPI said in a statement.
"We asked Pirate Party UK to remove the proxy because The Pirate Bay is an illegal site that is undermining the growth of legal digital music services," BPI CEO Geoff Taylor added in a statement. "We believe its executives should respect the law, and the basic right of creative people to be paid for their work."
The problems I have with the BPIs claims though are:
1. Studies have shown that pirates may pay more for music than legit people.
2. From what I've heard Artists may be paid a small amount of the actual sale.
3. DD services may offer worse options e.g. lack of lossless audio.
I'm sure there are other things I have left out as well.
By tech3475 on 19 Dec 2012
4. They don't address the fact that modern music is appallingly mastered (and deliberately so) and isn't worth anything anyway (IMO of course).
By Trippynet on 20 Dec 2012
greed isn't good
Maybe if the legal download services weren't massively overpriced they would become a viable option. Why is it often twice the cost of an actual DVD from the shops, when there is no duplication or distribution cost? Its just greedy. I'm not condoning piracy, but I can understand why people do itwhen the alternative is to be ripped off.
By profet79 on 25 Dec 2012
- Flickr redesign: is it enough to tempt photographers back?
- Hands on with the new Google Maps
- Nokia Lumia 925 review: first look
- Why I won't subscribe to Creative Cloud
- GoPro camera strapped to a remote-control helicopter: the ultimate boy's toy
- Acer Iconia A1 review: first look
- Acer Aspire P3 review: first look
- Acer Aspire R7 review: first look
- How we produce the PC Pro podcast
- Google Now draining iPhone battery
- Start8 and ModernMix: making Windows 8 work on a desktop
- How to boost your mobile reception
- How to fix Facebook: Social Fixer
- Taking the stress out of WordPress updates
- Where to download free web fonts
- Turn your tablet into a Sky+ remote control
- How to measure the success of a new IT system
- Three years on: the state of the tablet market
- Windows 8: what works and what doesn't
- Yes, I write down my passwords