Pirate Party drops proxy after BPI legal threat
By Nicole Kobie
Posted on 19 Dec 2012 at 13:53
The Pirate Party UK has agreed to shut down a proxy to The Pirate Bay following legal action by music industry body the BPI.
Earlier this year, the BPI won a court order forcing ISPs to block access to the file-sharing site. Proxies offering access immediately popped up, including one hosted by the UK branch of the Pirate Party.
At the beginning of December, the BPI asked the Pirate Party to remove it. The political party initially refused, but has now declared it cannot afford to fight the case in court.
The law at present is clear and makes any decision to continue hosting the proxy untenable
"Despite attempts by elected members to resolve this situation, the law at present is clear and makes any decision to continue hosting the proxy untenable," said the Pirate Party's lawyer, Frances Nash of Ralli.
"This is not the outcome the party wanted however, any challenge to this proposed action would make it financially impossible for the party to deal with other issues for which they actively campaign on a daily basis," Nash added.
"The Pirate Party strongly believes that site blocking is both disproportionate and ineffective and will continue to lobby for digital rights and their wider manifesto."
At the end of last week, party leader Loz Kaye released a statement saying the BPI's legal claims were "personally directed" at six executive members of the party, rather than the party itself.
The BPI said it did write to the executives as individuals, but only because that was the only legal recourse it had. "Because the Pirate Party is not a limited company and has no form of legal personality, the proper legal course was to write to the executive members personally," the BPI said in a statement.
"We asked Pirate Party UK to remove the proxy because The Pirate Bay is an illegal site that is undermining the growth of legal digital music services," BPI CEO Geoff Taylor added in a statement. "We believe its executives should respect the law, and the basic right of creative people to be paid for their work."
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
The problems I have with the BPIs claims though are:
1. Studies have shown that pirates may pay more for music than legit people.
2. From what I've heard Artists may be paid a small amount of the actual sale.
3. DD services may offer worse options e.g. lack of lossless audio.
I'm sure there are other things I have left out as well.
By tech3475 on 19 Dec 2012
4. They don't address the fact that modern music is appallingly mastered (and deliberately so) and isn't worth anything anyway (IMO of course).
By Trippynet on 20 Dec 2012
greed isn't good
Maybe if the legal download services weren't massively overpriced they would become a viable option. Why is it often twice the cost of an actual DVD from the shops, when there is no duplication or distribution cost? Its just greedy. I'm not condoning piracy, but I can understand why people do itwhen the alternative is to be ripped off.
By profet79 on 25 Dec 2012
- Windows 8.1 Update: an abject surrender
- The insane economics of Sky Now TV
- No such thing as a free app... so pay up if you want quality
- Time to outlaw crapware-laden installers
- Windows Phone 8.1 video: hands-on
- Office for iPad: key information
- Why every PC buyer owes Richard Durkin a debt of gratitude
- HTC One M8 vs Samsung Galaxy S5: 2014's big-hitters compared
- Windows XP end of life: key information
- Cut out the broadband jargon? What jargon?
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- Raspberry Pi and Wolfram: a must-have for every child
- Could you get by with Office Web Apps?
- The best Android antivirus apps for 2014
- Headings vs headers: how to use both in Word
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs
- Invoices and VAT: how to set up your documents correctly