EU gives Google a month to deal with search complaints
By Reuters and Nicole Kobie
Posted on 19 Dec 2012 at 10:32
The EU has given Google a month to form detailed proposals to resolve an investigation into its control of the search market.
The EU's antitrust chief, Joaquin Almunia, delivered the ultimatum in a meeting with Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt in Brussels.
Alumnia said Google has until January to submit a written plan on how it will resolve complaints that it's abusing its search market dominance by blocking rivals, including Microsoft.
"Since our preliminary talks with Google started in July, we have substantially reduced our differences regarding possible ways to address each of the four competition concerns expressed by the Commission," Almunia said in a statement.
On the basis of the progress made, I now expect Google to come forward with a detailed commitment text in January 2013
"On the basis of the progress made, I now expect Google to come forward with a detailed commitment text in January 2013."
Almunia said he would seek feedback from rivals and users once he's received Google's proposal. Google said it continues to work cooperatively with the Commission.
The EU watchdog's two-year investigation has centered on complaints that Google unfairly favoured its services over its rivals in search results, and that it may have copied material from travel and restaurant websites without permission.
US case delayed
The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is also investigating Google over similar issues. The FTC ruling was expected to come within days, but now won't appear for several weeks. Sources told Reuters the FTC could drop its investigation into Google without requiring any major change to how the company operates.
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
What is the EU antitrust chief's last name: Alumnia or Almunia?
By jonathandk2 on 19 Dec 2012
why is Apple not investigated
I cant understand why ms get investigated for making people use explorer, now google get investigated because they choose to make the "best" search engine and not let others have access to it, whereas Apple stop anyone else doing anything with their infrastructure. Not saying they shouldn't be allowed to, but where,s the fairness - oh silly me for being a naive person.
By gfmoore on 19 Dec 2012
- CeBit 2014 diary: Cameron comes to town
- The 5 most interesting UK businesses at SXSW
- Quickest way to upload 1GB? Hop on a train
- Move over Delia: IBM Watson is cooking tonight
- Eric Schmidt on the double-edged smartphone: friend and foe
- Getty joins the race to the bottom
- Hour of Code: five steps to learn how to code
- Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet review: first look
- Sony Xperia Z2 review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy Gear 2 review: first look
- Headings vs headers: how to use both in Word
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs
- Invoices and VAT: how to set up your documents correctly
- Nexus 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S4 Active: the best phone for avoiding screen burn
- How much is a social user worth?
- The key to choosing a secure password
- Thunderbolt Bridge: a fast Mac migration tool
- Should you advertise on Twitter?
- How to track a lost smartphone
- Self-publishing success: the best way to sell your book