Instagram turned down Twitter before selling to Facebook
By Barry Collins
Posted on 17 Dec 2012 at 09:06
Instagram executives reportedly turned down a $525 million offer from Twitter just weeks before selling to Facebook for $1 billion.
The news of Twitter's interest in the photography app comes amid a growing rift between the two companies, with Instagram images no longer displaying by default in tweets and Twitter unveiling its own photo filters.
Sources close to the negotiations between the two companies told the New York Times that Instagram had verbally agreed a price of $525 million with Twitter executives in March last year. However, Instagram chief executive Kevin Systrom reportedly turned down the offer because he wanted the site to "remain independent".
Only weeks later, Instagram had agreed its $1 billion deal with Facebook, which actually closed at $735 million because of a sharp fall in Facebook's share price.
Twitter executives were "shocked" that Instagram hadn't given them the opportunity to make a counter offer, as the company was willing to increase its bid, according to the New York Times report.
News of the Twitter bid could put Instagram's Systrom in a tight spot. In testimony given to the Californian Corporations Department, which was investigating whether Facebook's acquisition of Instagram was in the best interests of the social network's shareholders, Systrom repeatedly denied that there had been any other buyout offers for his company.
When pressed twice on whether he'd received bids from any other companies, Systrom answered: "We never received any formal offers or term sheets," without making mention of the verbal discussions with Twitter, according to the New York Times.
"We never received any formal offers or term sheets"
Which makes it clear he did receive informal offers, not a surprise to anyone. Surprised he didn't go back to Twitter to try and get more out of them; suspect Facebook got in there with a too good to refuse take it or leave it offer. Instagram may not have been worth a billion but depriving Twitter of their userbase was worth it to Facebook.
By Mark_Thompson on 17 Dec 2012
- How to get the Windows 10 Technical Preview, plus release date, features and latest news
- Why the Microsoft Band could be a game changer
- Windows 10 trackpad shortcuts: Microsoft takes a leaf out of Apple's book
- Five ways Amazon Fire TV Stick beats Google Chromecast
- HP's vision for the future of PCs: the 3D Sprout
- Google Glass: mugger bait, pub problem and other lessons learned from two dangerous weeks
- Twitter, please don't fiddle with my feed
- How Satya Nadella can get some pay-raise karma
- Windows 10: a step back to go forward
- Michael Dell: Cloud infrastructure is the roads, bridges and highways of the 21st century
- How to check your identity hasn’t been sold to the hackers
- Tim Cook: this is how much TV has changed since the 70s
- Westminster wins the .London battle
- 20 years of PC Pro: from deep pan pizza to virtualisation
- Five reasons why the Apple Watch leaves me cold
- How to sell more ebooks on Amazon
- 10 ways to make your business more secure
- Top five VoIP mistakes
- How to add in-app purchasing to an iPhone, Android or Windows app
- Remote-control ransomware: TeamViewer and software hardball
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office