Why LCD still dominates display technology
Posted on 11 Dec 2012 at 09:55
LCD screens were expected to slowly fade and die, giving way to lighter, thinner and tougher organic light-emitting diode (OLED) panels in everything from smartphones to tablets, TVs and monitors.
But LCD is refusing to go quietly as its picture quality keeps improving. At the same time, the major backers of credit card-thin OLED panels - led by Samsung and LG - are struggling to make the technology cheap enough to mass produce.
The two South Korean firms this year showcased 55in OLED TVs, but priced at around $10,000 - 10 times that of an LCD equivalent - they have yet to reach the commercial market.
OLED displays, used on Samsung's Galaxy S and Note smartphones, have been touted as the future display model to replace LCDs across the consumer electronics spectrum - from TVs to computers, laptops, tablets and smartphones. The technology is potentially more energy efficient and offers higher contrast in images than LCD, and is so thin and flexible that future mobile device screens will be unbreakable. They could even be folded or rolled up like a newspaper.
OLED still has a long way to go to become a mainstream display, as it has to become bigger and improve picture quality
But OLED panel makers such as Samsung and LG have yet to address major manufacturing challenges to drive down costs to compete against LCD panels, which also effectively killed off plasma screens.
"OLED still has a long way to go to become a mainstream display, as it has to become bigger and improve picture quality," said Chung Won-seok, an analyst at HI Investment and Securities. "The use of OLEDs will continue to be confined to small displays at least for the next two to three years. Its usage as a mainstream TV panel is only likely in 2014, but even then there's a possibility of intense competition with LCD TVs as that technology keeps improving."
According to DisplaySearch, it will take another four years for OLED screens to capture even a tenth of the global TV screen market.
Pixel battle ground
Far from fading, LCD panels now offer better picture quality and use less power, creating robust demand from smartphone and tablet makers alike.
Apple moved the goalposts by upgrading the display resolution for its iPhone and iPad, still the high-end LCD market's gold standard, prompting rivals to upgrade their display panels. Analysts at Macquarie predict Apple will adopt high-resolution screens for the MacBook Air and iMac next year, accelerating the industry's shift to high-resolution displays.
"It's only a matter of time [before] other high-end notebook companies such as Sony, Toshiba and Samsung upgrade their screens to high-resolution to compete with Apple's MacBook series," said Macquarie analyst Henry Kim.
Taiwan's HTC has introduced the Droid DNA smartphone with a 440 pixel per inch (ppi) density - the sharpest smartphone screen yet, with far higher resolution than the iPad's 330ppi and the iPhone 5's 326ppi. Samsung's Galaxy S III, which uses an OLED screen, has 306ppi density.
"The pixel war is an absolute bonanza for LCD makers," said Kim Byung-ki, analyst at Kiwoom Securities. "Manufacturers from LG Display to Samsung, Sharp and Chimei (Innolux) all will gradually convert their traditional lines into more high-end product fabs, and that will curtail supply and boost profitability."
These higher-resolution panels cost more than double the commodity-type LCD screens, boosting panel producers' profits. Even Samsung, the standard bearer for OLED panels and also a major LCD manufacturer, is actively promoting LCD screens for tablets and laptops over OLED, said one source familiar with the matter.
Supply crisis on horizon
However, the push for more profitable models with higher resolution could create its own set of problems – with a shortage in supply a real possibility. To squeeze in more pixels per inch, panel makers are upgrading their thin-film transistor (TFT) panel production facilities to new IGZO or LTPS processing technologies that require almost twice as many processing steps and which suffer higher faulty product rates and lost output.
Japan's Sharp is the frontrunner in IGZO technology, which uses indium gallium zinc oxide instead of amorphous silicon, in panel manufacturing. LG, a major supplier to Apple, is investing $1.1bn over the next year in its production of low-temperature poly silicon (LTPS) panels - a technology used to make screens for the iPhone and iPad.
While new technologies can be game-changers, these panels are not simple to produce, limiting availability and driving up manufacturing costs.
"The LCD industry is improving more strongly than expected and panels are likely to be in short supply from 2013, as manufacturers upgrade their lines to increase high-end products. This requires more processing time and steps, reducing total output," said Kim Dong-won, an analyst at Hyundai Securities.
Converting a line to IGZO and LTPS processing can cut LCD output by 30-70%, according to BNP Paribas.
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
It's the old, old, story
Over the years we have been told all sorts of things were going to replace older technologies:
Unix would replace Windows (The pre NT, non pre-emptive multitasking variety), on the desktop.
Bubble memory would replace Disks.
Gallium Arsenide would replace silicon.
Fuel cells would replace batteries. (This last one crops up every couple of years and the announcement is always that it will be commercially available in two years time.)
In each case, the incumbent technology just keeps improving and overtakes the usurper before it even starts selling in mass quantities.
By qpw3141 on 11 Dec 2012
OLED will replace LCD eventually, there's no question of that.
LCD tech is rapidly running out of steam. Other than pushing up the resolution to insane levels there is not much more the panel manufacturers can do to improve LCD. The limitations that remain are fundamental ones.
I think a lot of the doubt surrounding OLED comes because most people's only exposure to it comes from the mediocre screens Samsung fit to their phones.
But a real OLED screen is a sight to behold. The perfect blacks and amazingly vibrant colours are far beyond what a backlit technology like LCD will ever be capable of.
Production costs will drop as more panel manufacturers start OLED production and eventually LCD will be relegated to the very bottom of the market.
By Ramtop on 11 Dec 2012
Possibly but we've been hearing this for many years, now.
Sometimes a technology promises a lot but never materialises because no one ever manages to sort out the nitty gritty of the productions problems to make it cost effective.
By qpw3141 on 12 Dec 2012
- CeBit 2014 diary: Cameron comes to town
- The 5 most interesting UK businesses at SXSW
- Quickest way to upload 1GB? Hop on a train
- Move over Delia: IBM Watson is cooking tonight
- Eric Schmidt on the double-edged smartphone: friend and foe
- Getty joins the race to the bottom
- Hour of Code: five steps to learn how to code
- Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet review: first look
- Sony Xperia Z2 review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy Gear 2 review: first look
- Headings vs headers: how to use both in Word
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs
- Invoices and VAT: how to set up your documents correctly
- Nexus 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S4 Active: the best phone for avoiding screen burn
- How much is a social user worth?
- The key to choosing a secure password
- Thunderbolt Bridge: a fast Mac migration tool
- Should you advertise on Twitter?
- How to track a lost smartphone
- Self-publishing success: the best way to sell your book