TVShack owner O'Dwyer cuts deal to avoid US extradition
By Nicole Kobie
Posted on 28 Nov 2012 at 11:13
A Sheffield student accused of online piracy has cut a deal to avoid extradition to the US and a possible jail sentence.
Richard O'Dwyer ran a website called TVShack.com, which linked to sites offering illegitimate downloads. He has been fighting extradition to the US over the issue.
Today, a court accepted a "deferred prosecution" deal, which means O'Dwyer will pay a small amount of compensation, and travel to the US to sign an undertaking not to infringe copyright laws again. He will then return to the UK to have the extradition request formally dropped.
According to the BBC, the judge said it was a "very satisfactory outcome", adding: "It would be very nice for everyone if this was resolved happily before Christmas."
Speaking to The Guardian, Richard's mother Julia O'Dwyer said she was surprised to hear the news. "I didn't know this was going to happen today – I'm at work! I read a comment on Twitter with someone reporting what the judge had said and just burst into tears," she said, adding she was yet to hear from her son, who was still in class.
The solution follows a similar positive outcome for accused hacker Gary McKinnon, whose extradition to the US was blocked on human rights grounds by home secretary Theresa May last month - who said she couldn't intervene in O'Dwyer's case.
The decision to drop the O'Dwyer's extradition was welcomed by Jim Killock, executive director of the Open Rights Group. "But we must remember that without this deal, he was due to be sent to the USA for an alleged crime apparently committed in the UK," he warned.
"Is the UK government happy for the US to assume jurisdiction over every UK internet user?" he asked. "The government would do well to take a long hard look at its extradition arrangements with the USA."
His view was echoed by Isabella Sankey, Liberty's director of policy. "This will be a huge relief for Richard, but how appalling that he had to wait so long for the US authorities to make this decision," she told the BBC. "Case after case shows that our extradition arrangements must be overhauled to allow people who have never left these shores to be dealt with here at home."
Why travel to US?
The article states, 'and travel to the US to sign an undertaking not to infringe copyright laws again'.
So why can't the US Embassy 'pop round' to his UK address with the papers to sign?
This could be dangerous in that once in the USA, they can do what they want negating any agreement made.
There is also the cost of the travel when patently unnecessary.
I'd be wary personally.....
By tonybro on 28 Nov 2012
"I'd be wary personally....."
You and me both!!
By jontym123 on 28 Nov 2012
'and travel to the US to sign an undertaking not to infringe copyright laws again'
Said the Spider to the fly!
By Jaberwocky on 29 Nov 2012
The US, as usual, says jump and the UK government asks how high? Just who does the UK government represent? It seems the interests of the US are taken ahead of UK citizens! If I was this kid, I'd be very wary of a ruse of somekind by the US authorities who break treaties, laws and agreements wholesale!
By lablarry on 2 Dec 2012
- Flickr redesign: is it enough to tempt photographers back?
- Hands on with the new Google Maps
- Nokia Lumia 925 review: first look
- Why I won't subscribe to Creative Cloud
- GoPro camera strapped to a remote-control helicopter: the ultimate boy's toy
- Acer Iconia A1 review: first look
- Acer Aspire P3 review: first look
- Acer Aspire R7 review: first look
- How we produce the PC Pro podcast
- Google Now draining iPhone battery
- The ICO's shame-faced u-turn on cookies
- Start8 and ModernMix: making Windows 8 work on a desktop
- How to boost your mobile reception
- How to fix Facebook: Social Fixer
- Taking the stress out of WordPress updates
- Where to download free web fonts
- Turn your tablet into a Sky+ remote control
- How to measure the success of a new IT system
- Three years on: the state of the tablet market
- Windows 8: what works and what doesn't