Google claims Microsoft's patent use worth $94bn
Posted on 21 Nov 2012 at 09:01
A Google expert witness has claimed Microsoft will make $94 billion in revenue by 2017 thanks to Google's patented wireless technology in the Surface tablet and Xbox console.
Michael Dansky, an expert for Google's Motorola Mobility unit, testified on the last day of a high stakes trial over patents between Microsoft and Google in Seattle. The $94 billion figure he cited also includes a wireless adapter that Microsoft no longer sells, although it was not clear how far back he was counting past revenues.
The week-long trial has been probing how much Microsoft should pay Google for a license to some of Motorola's patents. Google bought Motorola earlier this year for $12.5 billion, partly for its library of communications patents.
Motorola had sought up to $4 billion a year for its wireless and video patents, while Microsoft argues its rival deserves just over $1 million a year.
You will have a difficult time selling smartphones or tablets
If US District Judge James Robart decides Google deserves only a small royalty, then its Motorola patents would be a weaker bargaining chip for Google to negotiate licensing deals with rivals.
The rapid rise of smartphones has sparked an explosion of litigation between major players disputing ownership of the underlying technology and the design of handsets.
Apple and Microsoft have been litigating in courts around the world against Google and partners like Samsung that use the Android operating system on their mobile devices.
Apple contends that Android is basically a copy of its iOS smartphone software, and Microsoft holds patents that it contends cover a number of Android features.
In return, Motorola and some other Android hardware makers launched countering legal action.
Before trial, Robart said testimony about patent license agreements between Microsoft, Motorola and other tech companies could be disclosed to the public, along with other sensitive financial information.
However, the judge reversed himself this week and said he was bound by appellate precedent to keep that information secret. Yesterday, he cleared the courtroom and heard two hours of testimony in secret.
During the open session, Dansky said Motorola's video patents were crucial to Microsoft and other tech companies, and deserve a high royalty.
"You will have a difficult time selling smartphones or tablets," Dansky said, without Motorola's technology.
Robart is not expected to release a ruling for several weeks as both companies must file further legal briefs.
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
I hope Google collects
Google deserve a win on this. Being constantly dragged through the docks by the likes of Apple & MS is totally slowing down innovation and progress, Apple & MS are rolling in dough and just want more. So I believe give it to google and let them dictate the prices Apple & MS must pay Google, especially that MS forces handset makers who use Android to pay it a licence and now Apple just got the squeeze on HTC - So this is retribution - payback time for the fairer company namely Google!
By nicomo on 21 Nov 2012
- Move over Delia: IBM Watson is cooking tonight
- Eric Schmidt on the double-edged smartphone: friend and foe
- Getty joins the race to the bottom
- Hour of Code: five steps to learn how to code
- Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet review: first look
- Sony Xperia Z2 review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy Gear 2 review: first look
- Nokia XL review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy S5 review: first look
- Nokia X review: first look
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs
- Invoices and VAT: how to set up your documents correctly
- Nexus 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S4 Active: the best phone for avoiding screen burn
- How much is a social user worth?
- The key to choosing a secure password
- Thunderbolt Bridge: a fast Mac migration tool
- Should you advertise on Twitter?
- How to track a lost smartphone
- Self-publishing success: the best way to sell your book
- 1.6TB SSD: why would you need one?