Struggling AMD denies report it's up for sale
Posted on 14 Nov 2012 at 09:02
AMD has denied the company is up for sale, after sources revealed the struggling chipmaker has hired bankers JPMorgan Chase & Co to explore its options.
Sources told Reuters that an outright sale of the company is not the main option, and other choices could include a sale of its portfolio of patents.
However, AMD denied the report, saying it was "not actively pursuing a sale of the company or significant assets at this time."
"AMD's board and management believe that the strategy the company is currently pursuing to drive long-term growth by leveraging AMD's highly-differentiated technology assets is the right approach to enhance shareholder value," spokesman Drew Prairie said in an email to Reuters.
FeatureAMD: what went wrong?
When asked why AMD had hired JPMorgan, Prairie declined to confirm the engagement, saying the company does not comment on its relationship with investment banks. A JPMorgan spokeswoman declined to comment.
One of Silicon Valley's oldest chipmakers, AMD is laying off engineers and some analysts are concerned it may not find new markets for its chips in time to reverse a declining cash reserve.
Since the 1980s, AMD has competed with much larger Intel and at times has made inroads with its PC and server chips. But setbacks at AMD limited those gains and AMD now faces new competition from companies designing low-cost and power-efficient chips based on ARM's technology.
Like Intel, AMD was caught flat-footed in recent years with the emergence and fast growth of mobile devices. But while Intel has deep pockets to fund research on new products to catch up, AMD faces declining cash flows and a more modest balance sheet.
Some investors believe part or all of AMD could be bought by a technology company that might want to emulate Apple's tight control of software and components, a strategy credited in part for the success of the iPad and iPhone.
One source described AMD as a "legacy company" and said it might prove difficult to sell because of its dependence on the PC industry and lack of strong mobile offerings.
Another source said AMD's game console chip and embedded chips businesses were growing and attractive.
Microsoft, Google, Samsung, Intel and even Facebook have been suggested by Wall Street analysts as potential suitors that could benefit from some of AMD's chip business, including its graphics division, PC processors and server chips.
Others say AMD's most valuable asset may be its deep bench of engineers or its patents. Goldman Sachs analyst James Covello estimated in a recent note to clients the chances of AMD's PC processor business being sold are between 15% and 30%.
Rather than selling AMD, bankers could help the chipmaker strengthen its finances in order to acquire technology it believes it needs to tackle new markets, said Williams Financial analyst Cody Acree.
Rory Read took over as AMD's CEO in 2011 promising to fix long-standing execution problems that have plagued the chipmaker. But AMD has continued to lose money as well as market share to Intel and graphic chip rival Nvidia.
AMD said last month it would slash 15% of its workforce, while devoting more resources to areas outside of its traditional PC business, including communications, industrial and gaming applications.
In October, Read told analysts on a conference call he had underestimated the speed of change in the PC industry and said AMD would move quickly to focus on selling chips for communications, industrial and gaming applications.
AMD recently announced it has licensed technology from ARM and will use it to build low-power chips for servers. But those products aren't expected to launch until 2014 and AMD is one of several companies vying for a microserver market that will be small compared to traditional servers that power most data centers.
With the company burning through cash, analysts have recently become concerned about future liquidity and say AMD needs to turn its business around sooner than later.
You can always find any opinion you want from one of these guess-workers.
Intel delivered sustained damage to AMD during their OEM blackmail spree, but nothing fatal - if AMD concentrate on what they are good at (value), there's no reason to believe they can't survive long-term.
As an aside, the last 2 laptops I've recommended to people were Intel although I'm generally an AMD man.
By dubiou on 14 Nov 2012
AMD did help keep Intel pricing down and innovation fast during the years where competition was neck and neck.
Sadly though for AMD Intel simply cut some of the fat from it's long planned technology release programme and skipped a few chip release phases (marketing churn) to outpace AMD.
A painful movew for Intel, but it seems to have delivered the knockout punch to its rival, sadly.
Now prices are higher again and Intel are not moving through the release lines as quickly.
By Gindylow on 15 Nov 2012
- Play it again: Berlin's Computer Game Museum
- Switching from iPhone to Android: what I miss, what I don't
- Tech City: Easy to score when you move the goalposts
- How to remove SkyDrive from the Windows 8.1 Explorer
- Switching from iPhone to Android? Switch off iMessage
- Why is Google pumping more money into Firefox?
- Sky Broadband Shield review
- Samsung Galaxy S4: how to double your battery life
- Motorola Moto G review: first look
- IBM Watson meets Willy Wonka
- Jon Honeyball's money's-no-object Christmas gift idea
- The importance of load balancing
- Windows Phone App Studio: an easy way to create your first Windows Phone 8 app
- The end of Windows XP support: what it really means for businesses
- Don't rely on Chrome's password vault
- Using Buffer to manage your social media
- Microsoft needs its own Steve Jobs
- Forget credit cards: hackers want your Facebook account
- Can't get fast enough broadband? Here's what to do
- Leap Motion and the battle against UI stagnation