Virgin and mobile networks snub net neutrality pledge
By Barry Collins
Posted on 24 Jul 2012 at 15:28
Virgin Media, Everything Everywhere and Vodafone are among the high-profile absentees from a new voluntary code of conduct on net neutrality, due to be unveiled tomorrow.
The voluntary code lays down a set of principles in support of the open internet, including pledges to give users access to all legal content and a promise not to discriminate against content providers on the basis of a commercial rivalry. The code was drafted after discussions between Communications Minister Ed Vaizey and ISPs.
These principles remain open to misinterpretation and potential exploitation
Signatories on an early draft of the agreement seen by PC Pro include BT, BSkyB, O2, TalkTalk and Three. However, there are high profile omissions, including Virgin Media, Vodafone and the two Everything Everywhere networks, T-Mobile and Orange.
A spokesman for Virgin Media told PC Pro that, after weeks of negotiation, the company had refused to sign because the agreement wasn't tough enough. "We have no intention of discriminating or treating data differently on the basis of who owns or publishes it but we are not signing up to the Code as it stands," Virgin Media said in a statement.
"We had tried to encourage something that would be clearer for industry and give consumers improved transparency. However, these principles remain open to misinterpretation and potential exploitation so, while we welcome efforts to reach a broad consensus to address potential future issues, we will be seeking greater certainty before we consider signing."
Everything Everywhere said it was "too early to know how a code of this type will affect customers' internet experience, but it is something that we will continually review".
"That said, we support the principle of the open internet and believe transparency is the way to achieve this, which is why last year we signed up to the BSG’s code of practice on traffic management in order to make our policies clear to customers."
Vodafone said it refused to sign because "the language chosen by the signatories is impractical and does not reflect the services enjoyed by millions of mobile phone users every day."
"We have a range of internet access plans and provide customers with full details of the products and services that can be accessed with each plan. These plans offer internet access to smartphone and dongle users, but under the code we would have been unable to use the phrase ‘internet access’ to describe many of the services enjoyed by customers," a spokesman for the network added.
Not "internet access"
Under the terms of the agreement, ISPs and mobile networks have agreed not to use the term "internet access" to describe any package where certain classes of content, applications or services are blocked. However, they are free to apply whatever restrictions they choose, provided they don't use the term.
The ISPs also retain the ability to choke certain types of traffic, such as P2P file-sharing services, to manage congestion on their networks.
They also agree to make any traffic management transparent to their customers.
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
Have I read this right?
So it's about net neutrality but they reserve the right to throttle certain types of traffic and block websites as long as they dont call it Internet Access? Is that it, really.
By JStairmand on 25 Jul 2012
Net Neutrality, a cover-up over Net Censure
Net Neutrality, a cover-up over Net Censure
Yes "JStairmand" 25 Jul, unfortunatelly you are right: the self-appointed "Net Neutrality" is actually a false name to cover a true action of CENSURE of the Net.
There have been plenty stages: in the 1990s, it suddenly became impossible in France to import US modems; then international bodies, once very efficient in their charge of UNIFYING languages and specifications, suddenly turned back to the exact opposite, and took pretext of specs updates to issue new specs DIFFERENT in each country or region; then you saw Microsoft refusing to sell other language versions (e.g.in France after 1995 it has been impossible to buy US versions of Windows or Office or VisualStudio, I had to buy them from US retailers and have US friends send it to me); you have now, e.g. on YouTube, more and more contents available only in certain areas.
Of course this CANNOT be explained by any commercial or technical or industrial reason; it is a political move, that encompasses "Net Neutrality" as many past others, and even many more to come.
Versailles, Thu 26 Jul 2012 14:35:00 +0200
By MichelMerlin on 26 Jul 2012
- Hello Cortana, it's nice to meet you
- Windows 8.1 Update: an abject surrender
- The insane economics of Sky Now TV
- No such thing as a free app... so pay up if you want quality
- Time to outlaw crapware-laden installers
- Windows Phone 8.1 video: hands-on
- Office for iPad: key information
- Why every PC buyer owes Richard Durkin a debt of gratitude
- HTC One M8 vs Samsung Galaxy S5: 2014's big-hitters compared
- Windows XP end of life: key information
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- Raspberry Pi and Wolfram: a must-have for every child
- Could you get by with Office Web Apps?
- The best Android antivirus apps for 2014
- Headings vs headers: how to use both in Word