Privacy row forces Virgin to backtrack on Tube terms
By Stewart Mitchell
Posted on 11 Jun 2012 at 09:16
Virgin Media has changed the terms and conditions for people using its services on the London Underground to allay fears it could snoop on user communications.
The Tube Wi-Fi services, which began rolling out last week, came under fire from politicians and privacy campaigners over the wording of the user agreement, which appeared to give the carrier the option to monitor messages.
According to a report from the Evening Standard, the situation came to a head after it emerged that using the service would be taken as agreeing to terms and that “with your permission, we may monitor email and internet communications, including without limitation, any content or material transmitted over the services”.
Virgin admitted to the paper the wording was too vague after complaints from MP Robert Halfon and the Big Brother Watch privacy group.
With your permission, we may monitor email and internet communications, including without limitation, any content or material
The company said it had never intended to snoop on emails or other communications and had only included the wording to cover itself legally for blocking illegal content such as child porn.
“We reserve the right to monitor and control data volume and/or types of traffic transmitted via the services,” the passage now reads.
“We will not pass on your personal information to third parties except in accordance with this agreement or where we are required to disclose that information in order to comply with any legal or regulatory requirements.”
Virgin couldn't be reached for comment at the time of publishing.
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
Is the new wording any better?
It seems to give them the right to "control" as well as "monitor" which the original wording did not. Is "types of traffic" narrower than "any content or material" - without definitions, it's open to debate.
May I suggest "We will monitor and retain data only to the extent necessary to deliver the service and comply with the law, and only for these purposes."
By JohnAHind on 11 Jun 2012
VPN, nuff said
By Chrisfjr1300 on 11 Jun 2012
- Quickest way to upload 1GB? Hop on a train
- Move over Delia: IBM Watson is cooking tonight
- Eric Schmidt on the double-edged smartphone: friend and foe
- Getty joins the race to the bottom
- Hour of Code: five steps to learn how to code
- Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet review: first look
- Sony Xperia Z2 review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy Gear 2 review: first look
- Nokia XL review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy S5 review: first look
- Headings vs headers: how to use both in Word
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs
- Invoices and VAT: how to set up your documents correctly
- Nexus 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S4 Active: the best phone for avoiding screen burn
- How much is a social user worth?
- The key to choosing a secure password
- Thunderbolt Bridge: a fast Mac migration tool
- Should you advertise on Twitter?
- How to track a lost smartphone
- Self-publishing success: the best way to sell your book