White House raises doubts over SOPA
By Stewart Mitchell
Posted on 16 Jan 2012 at 10:23
Opposition to the controversial US Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) continues to mount, with White House advisers raising concerns over the current proposals.
The proposed legislation has been attacked by web companies and campaigners as being harmful to a free internet, but has support among rights holders and their lobbyists.
The White House has issued a blog post written by a team of top-level advisers outlining what legislation they would support, and suggesting the current legislation needs more balance.
“Right now, Congress is debating a few pieces of legislation concerning the very real issue of online piracy, including SOPA, the PROTECT IP Act, and the Online Protection and Digital Enforcement Act (OPEN),” the officials wrote in the White House blog.
“We want to take this opportunity to tell you what the Administration will support — and what we will not support. Any effective legislation should reflect a wide range of stakeholders, including everyone from content creators to the engineers that build and maintain the infrastructure of the internet.”
With large web companies including Google and Facebook expressing concern about plans to block overseas sites that allegedly contain pirated material, the White House said it would rule out any such measures.
“While we believe that online piracy by foreign websites is a serious problem that requires a serious legislative response, we will not support legislation that reduces freedom of expression, increases cyber security risk, or undermines the dynamic, innovative global internet,” the officials wrote.
The advisers called on both sides of the debate to work together to find common ground, with ”both content creators and internet platform providers working together to adopt voluntary measures and best practices to reduce online piracy”.
From around the web
Anyone with half a brain would have more than doubts...
Piracy is only a problem for people who imagine customers can be forced to buy their products.
Otherwise who would BUY a copy of the book Dracula, when they could legally download it and print their own copy? Who would buy a CD of classical music, when they could record themselves performing it?
Copyright protection doesn't guarantee sales any more than the absence of it prevents them.
SOPA is about spying on people. It's only logical outcome is people will become more secretive and adopt encryption protocols for ALL their internet use. Try catching the real criminals once that's the case.
I've got nothing to hide, but that's not the same thing as having no privacy. Email's I send to my wife should only be read by her, not vetted by some spotty teenager at my ISP under the auspices of conforming to a US copyright law.
By cheysuli on 16 Jan 2012 ![]()
Seems I wasn't the only one who thought this..
SOPA has been chucked out by the house of representatives at 10am local time.
Which is nice.
By cheysuli on 16 Jan 2012 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
