802.11ac routers to hit 800Mbit/sec this year
By Barry Collins in Las Vegas
Posted on 11 Jan 2012 at 19:17
Manufacturers are showing off the next-generation of wireless routers at CES, which they claim will hit actual throughput speeds of around 800Mbits/sec.
The next-gen routers are built on the 802.11ac standard, which is theoretically capable of speeds in excess of 1Gbits/sec. A prototype 802.11ac router on the Buffalo stand was delivering actual throughput of around 800Mbits/sec, which is around five or six times faster than the speeds we've recorded from 802.11n routers.
The 802.11ac standard operates in the 5GHz band, avoiding the congestion found in the 2.4GHz band used by most of today's wireless routers.
However, 802.11ac isn't backwards compatible with 802.11n, meaning router manufacturers will have to build support for both standards into their router products in the short-to-medium term.
The prototype AirStation WZR-1750H router being demonstrated on Buffalo's stand was using a triple antenna set-up to achieve the 800Mbits/sec speeds. The company claims it will be targeted at home users who wish to stream HD content around the house, and for wireless backup.
Buffalo is aiming to release the router in the third quarter of this year, although the 802.11ac standard is unlikely to be finalised before 2013.
Other manufacturers, including D-Link, are also planning to launch routers based on the draft 802.11ac specification this year.
From around the web
Obviously not just routers will need to be upgraded, every wireless receiver using b/n will also have to be replaced, including laptops. mobile phones, media players, internet radios, NAS and the rest.
With the explosion of wireless capable devices in the 5 years or so that n has been available that is going to mean a long and expensive/lucrative (depending on which side of the consumer/vendor divided you're on) change-over period.
By Phoomeister on 12 Jan 2012 ![]()
Speed isn't everything
Wireless simply provides convenience, not a solution. Reliability is paramount, particularly when streaming HD video. Switching on the fluorescent light in my kitchen provides enough interference to momentarily drop all the wireless connections in my flat. Until we circumvent that problem, wired connections will always take preference. Speed isn't everything.
By baldmosher on 12 Jan 2012 ![]()
Why ac?
There already is an 802.11a (American) so why use the name 802.11ac? will it be dc next?
What's the chances of them actually calling it 800mb/s when they could tell such a tall story. For sure they will flog with the deception 1GB/s.
800mbps is also possible using LED's,
http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/01/german-geniuses
-hit-800mbps-with-light-bulb-wlan/
Interference is my present issue; around 15 devices within range means I usually can't connect to my 802.11n router one floor up. Want to use your computer? Reset your router, every time.
Using 5GHz might improve things, or it might turn the washer on ;P
By skgiven on 12 Jan 2012 ![]()
observations
@baldmosher Strip light interference? That's a new one on me, I've done wireless installs in schools with hundreds of lights to no ill effect?
Is it just time for a new Strip light maybe?
@skgiven I often hear people mention multi device or multi router interference, and although moving to 5Ghz will mitigate that for now, It's often better and cheaper to stop forking out for top end routers and bite the bullet, buy some Cat 6, end the problem once and for all if your a needing sustained high bandwidth, oor your sight survey suggests over-crowding.
By Gindylow on 12 Jan 2012 ![]()
@Gindylow
"Strip light interference? That's a new one on me, I've done wireless installs in schools with hundreds of lights to no ill effect?
Is it just time for a new Strip light maybe?"
It isn't strip lighting that is the problem. It's Fluorescent lighting.
Incandescent strip lights do not cause interference. Compact fluorescents can.
By qpw3141 on 12 Jan 2012 ![]()
@ qpw3141
I've read it thrice, so it must be true ..
By moocifer on 12 Jan 2012 ![]()
@moocifer
Yes, I've found out what causes that, now.
If you refresh a page on this site after you have left a comment, even though the response box is empty it will, somehow, manage to post the message again.
I see someone has removed the duplicates. Thanks to whoever it was.
By qpw3141 on 12 Jan 2012 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement

