Google accuses Microsoft of "extortion" over patents
By Stewart Mitchell
Posted on 29 Sep 2011 at 11:08
The mobile phone patent spat between Microsoft and Google has descended into a mud-slinging match following yesterday's deal with Samsung.
That agreement means Samsung will pay a license fee for Microsoft patents for that are used within Google's OS.
The situation, which bizarrely sees Microsoft profit from handsets built around Android, sparked an angry response from Google, which accused its rival of “extortion”.
“This is the same tactic we’ve seen time and again from Microsoft,” said a Google spokesperson in a statement sent to PC Pro.
“Failing to succeed in the smartphone market, it is resorting to legal measures to extort profit from others’ achievements and hinder the pace of innovation. We remain focused on building new technology and supporting Android partners.”
Microsoft fired back at Google through its head of communications' Twitter feed, suggesting the company was acting like a baby.
“Let me boil down the Google statement from 48 words to 1,” said Frank Shaw. “Waaaah.”
haha well at least MS is doing the decent thing and allowing Google to use it's patents for a fee. Apple will have them banned soon
By TimoGunt on 29 Sep 2011
Must admit at one time I never would have thought to see Apple as the bad guy and Microsoft as an almost cuddle old uncle! In comparison to Apple's behaviour MS is almost being generous...
By skarlock on 29 Sep 2011
The thing to do is for Google and MS to settle this in court and have it rule on the patents.
Did Google ever comment about the Samsung tablet getting banned?
By james016 on 29 Sep 2011
The whole point...
of the patent system is to enable companies to develop technology (innovate) and allow other companies to innovate on those innovations, by licensing them from the original innovator.
Surely that is what is happening here? Microsoft seem to be following the principles of the system (gaining reward from their inventions, by allowing others to use their inventions and paying for the privilege).
Apple are the ones who aren't playing fair, they are abusing the system to stop innovation.
By big_D on 29 Sep 2011
Google has to be seen to be annoyed with this. Otherwise it would be seen to be rolling over.
I don't think they really care that much. The more PR they get for the Android OS the better.
By CraigieDD on 29 Sep 2011
@big_D Apple are doing just the same surely, but cannot agree a price with Samsung. But Microsoft and Samsung have agreed, and so both are happy. Presumably Apple want more than the $15 Microsoft want.
By MJ2010 on 29 Sep 2011
Microsoft and Apple have different strategies
Apple is trying to keep its patented features out of competitors products so that its own product is better. Thus it is not interested in licensing.
Microsoft is maximising revenue from its existing technology portfolio. It is also keeping the door open with licensees for future OS offerings.
By milliganp on 29 Sep 2011
No, Apple are banning the products, because they allegedly infringe on Apple's market share. In Europe, they want them banned, full-stop, end of story, due to them looking too much like an iPad or iPhone 4, nothing to do with patents.
Microsoft have said, "your products infringe out patents, pay us a 'fair' amount per product."
Of course, what 'fair' means to Microsoft, to Samsung and to the rest of us is another matter entirely. ;-)
By big_D on 29 Sep 2011
- How to get the Windows 10 Technical Preview, plus release date, features and latest news
- Why the Microsoft Band could be a game changer
- Windows 10 trackpad shortcuts: Microsoft takes a leaf out of Apple's book
- Internet tax: what it is and why it failed
- HP's vision for the future of PCs: the 3D Sprout
- Google Glass: mugger bait, pub problem and other lessons learned from two dangerous weeks
- Twitter, please don't fiddle with my feed
- How Satya Nadella can get some pay-raise karma
- Windows 10: a step back to go forward
- Michael Dell: Cloud infrastructure is the roads, bridges and highways of the 21st century
- How to check your identity hasn’t been sold to the hackers
- Tim Cook: this is how much TV has changed since the 70s
- Westminster wins the .London battle
- 20 years of PC Pro: from deep pan pizza to virtualisation
- Five reasons why the Apple Watch leaves me cold
- How to sell more ebooks on Amazon
- 10 ways to make your business more secure
- Top five VoIP mistakes
- How to add in-app purchasing to an iPhone, Android or Windows app
- Remote-control ransomware: TeamViewer and software hardball
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office