Skip to navigation
Latest News

Apple targets GetJar in app store name battle

Mobile Apps

By Nicole Kobie

Posted on 11 Jul 2011 at 13:16

Apple is once again attempting to block rival firms from using the term "app store".

The iPhone maker sent a cease and desist letter to independent application site GetJar, telling it to stop using the term "app store" - suggesting it describe its business as a "mobile download service" or an "application download service" instead.

The legal warning follows a suit with Amazon over the name of its "Appstore for Android". A judge recently refused to issue an injunction blocking Amazon from using the term, but the full case is yet to be heard.

It’s not as if we were waiting around for Apple to come up with the idea of app stores

GetJar said it will not stop using the term "app store", accusing Apple of "bullying".

"We were here long before Steve and co. We were built by developers, to help developers. Not to help sell handsets or search results," said chief marketing office Patrick Mork in a post on the GetJar blog. "In the words of Twisted Sister: 'We’re not going to take it!' Steve Jobs isn’t our dad."

The site said it started as a developers' platform in 2005, and first used the term app store in marketing material in 2009, "so it’s not as if we were waiting around for Apple to come up with the idea of app stores".

GetJar said it doesn't believe Apple is worried about competition from the much-smaller rival, as it actually redirects iPhone users to the Apple App Store. "It would be presumptuous of us to think so given the difference in size and scale that’s apparent between the two companies," Mork said. "Better yet, we don’t even compete with Apple. Nobody can on iOS as [it's] a closed ecosystem."

Closed market

The company said the cease and desist letter is the latest sign that the app market is becoming "increasingly closed".

"Its character is dictated by larger companies exercising excessive force to get bigger shares of the pie," Mork said. "For example, Android was supposed to be free and open; yet developers can’t choose their billing solution... If Apple isn’t suing Amazon, it’s suing start-ups."

Apple last week announced it had sold 15 billion apps from its store, while GetJar has sold two billion.

Apple has yet to return request for comment on this story.

Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here
User comments

Have to do it.

Apple can hardly ignore anyone else using the term while they're having a fight with Amazon over the same name.

That said, it's probably doing so for the appearance, really. Considering an injunction against Amazon has been refused, other than sending a letter, there's not really much more Apple can do until the case is settled up with Amazon.

By greemble on 11 Jul 2011

Mork - don't stop - you're absolutely right!

By nicomo on 11 Jul 2011

Is there any precedent...

For such a generic term being trademarked?

(I can't think of any)

By Anonymouse on 11 Jul 2011

Actually take a look...

Getjar and they do not advertise TO Apple users.

Throw in the fact that Getjar have been doing free apps to 'whoever' since 2004 and it becomes obvious Apple are pissin' in the wind on this one, should Getjar care to pay to resist... which apparantly they are prepared to do.

By fingerbob69 on 11 Jul 2011

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.



Most Commented News Stories
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest ReviewsSubscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Real World Computing


Sponsored Links

Your email:

Your password:

remember me


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.