Intel unveils 50-core supercomputing processor
By Darien Graham-Smith
Posted on 20 Jun 2011 at 14:27
Intel has released details of its next-generation “Knights Corner” processor – the first commercial implementation of its Many Integrated Cores (MIC) architecture for massively multi-core data processing.
Knights Corner will be supplied as a co-processor on a PCI-Express card, intended for use with traditional Xeon workstations. Hardware is scheduled for launch in 2012, but an early design, dubbed Knights Ferry, is already being trialled by several supercomputing laboratories, including SGI and the US National Center for Supercomputing Applications.
Knights Corner will compete with existing GPU-based approaches, such as Nvidia’s programmable Fermi architecture. Intel believes it will succeed thanks to a parallel programming model that’s almost identical to established x86 approaches.
If you can program a Xeon, you can program this microprocessor
“If you can program a Xeon, you can program this microprocessor,” announced Anthony Neal-Graves, general manager of Intel’s Many Integrated Core Computing division.
“You can use the same tools and the same compilers. That makes parallelism simpler for the end user. It provides a saving in terms of time and money, and allows programmers to be much more efficient in terms of what they do.”
Towards the “exascale era”
Knights Corner is a step towards Intel’s vision of reaching the “exascale era” by the end of the decade, in which computing performance will be measured in exaflops – one exaflop being 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 floating point operations per second.
“It’s a real challenge to scale up to that level of performance,” observed Michael Woodacre of SGI, speaking before the launch. “We’re looking at a 500x improvement in eight years. Even with Moore’s Law giving us more transistors, that’s only going to give us about 40x. So we’re really looking to MIC technology to get this additional order of magnitude performance improvement.”
The first Knights Corner hardware will be produced using a 22nm process, incorporating Intel's recently-announced Tri-Gate transistors.
From around the web
Nahh...
I'll stick to my 128K ZX Spectrum, who could possibly need any more computing power than that?
By mrmiley on 20 Jun 2011 ![]()
Yeah, but...
...will it run Crysis?
By PSilva on 20 Jun 2011 ![]()
@PSilva
He wants to complete The Hobbit before moving on to another game.
By JohnHo1 on 20 Jun 2011 ![]()
"A round green door is in front of you." Hope you mean the pure text version and not the adulterated version with images that came later?
By skarlock on 20 Jun 2011 ![]()
Some detail would be useful!
It would be useful to understand the features and relative power of each of the cores, memory bandwidth and power etc to understand what might possible achieved with this product.
By milliganp on 21 Jun 2011 ![]()
Text!!
I hope you mean the version that had lights on or off representing 0s and 1s - okay I'll allow 7bit ascii :)
By gfmoore on 21 Jun 2011 ![]()
lights!
er! holes in punch tape?
By gfmoore on 21 Jun 2011 ![]()
how long before these things make aes128 redundant - 20 years bet high low now.
By blagger123 on 2 Jul 2011 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement


