High Court awards damages to Operation Ore accused
By Nicole Kobie
Posted on 4 Apr 2011 at 14:29
The High Court has awarded damages to a man wrongfully caught up in the Operation Ore child porn investigation.
Operation Ore kicked off in 1999 in the US, with a list of suspects accused of paying for access to a "child pornography" site handed to UK police in 2002, leading to more than 1,400 prosecutions.
However, the evidence used to convict the accused paedophiles was flawed. Writing in PC Pro in 2005, computer expert and investigative journalist Duncan Campbell revealed that many of the accused were nothing more than victims of credit-card fraud.
British police were aware the evidence was flawed within months of starting the investigation, according to a new report published today on The Register.
Feature
Operation Ore exposedJeremy Clifford, now 51 from Watford, was one of thousands of people accused during the investigation, after his credit-card details were fraudulently used on the site in question. He was arrested in 2003.
Illicit images were found in the temporary internet files folder on his machine, but a police computer expert said at the time the thumbnail images could have been placed there without Clifford's knowledge.
Despite the expert finding no evidence that Clifford ever downloaded child pornography, Hertfordshire Police still proceeded with the charges, which were eventually dropped.
The court awarded Clifford £20,000 in damages, while the police force faces up to hundreds of thousands of pounds in costs.
“In my opinion it is an absolute disgrace that the police have been allowed to spend huge sums of public money recklessly and without apparent check or merit attacking Mr Clifford, in order to deflect from their own shortcomings,” Andre Clovis of Tuckers Solicitors, told the The Telegraph.
“This course of conduct caused costs to escalate. There appears to be no control mechanism over police spending in such circumstances, but this does not mean that the Chief Constable and his legal department should not be called to account for their actions.”
A spokesman for Hertfordshire Constabulary said: “Legal advice was taken beforehand and it was advised and expected that we had a reasonable chance of winning our case.”
Of the over 7,000 originally accused in the Operation Ore investigation, 3,744 people were arrested, 1,848 were charged, and 1,451 convicted. As many as 39 people committed suicide after being accused.
From around the web
Not that he was guilty but...
"...we had a reasonable chance of winning our case."
Surely there is something flawed in that argument.
By scooter91170 on 7 Apr 2011 ![]()
£20k is a pittance for the misery this guy has probably had to endure.
By SillyCasper on 7 Apr 2011 ![]()
Google image search
There must be millions of people with 'Illicit' thumb nails in their internet temp folders from Google image search or adverts on web pages.
It makes me wonder how much understanding the police have of web technology. It's best to have your browser setup to delete the cache on exit.
John
By jtallsmith on 8 Apr 2011 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
