Skip to navigation
Latest News

ISPs slam Digital Economy Act site blocking

roadclosed

By Stewart Mitchell

Posted on 1 Apr 2011 at 10:21

ISPs have slated the idea of blocking websites to prevent internet piracy ahead of further meetings to discuss the issue with Government officials next week.

The concept of blocking sites that offer access to copyright materials is included in the Digital Economy Act, but ISPs have said it would be expensive, ineffective and would place too much policing responsibility on providers.

The DEA went to judicial review last week over a mass notification system, which would see ISPs sending letters to accused file-sharers. A ruling is not expected for several weeks, but according to Trefor Davies, CTO of business ISP Timico, rights holders have been busy working behind the scenes to prioritise the issue of blocking sites.

“What has been going on in the meantime is further lobbying by rights holders to try and get ISPs to block access to websites that promote or support copyright infringement,” he said in a blog post. “With hindsight it looks as if this was an insurance policy on the part of the rights holders in case the DEA was thrown out in court or subject to delays.”

Both Timico and BT believe plans to make ISPs block copyright content would prove overbearing.

“Blocking is likely to be expensive, ineffective, have unintended consequences such as innocent websites being blocked, seen as censorship and require huge involvement of the judiciary,” said Davies. “I certainly would not be happy with ISPs or rights holders taking ownership of choosing which sites to block.”

The problem of who would decide what to block has also raised the hackles of BT. Although it is happy to block the content recommended by a third-party regulator, the ISP would not want to make such decisions itself.

“We are not in favour of ISPs voluntarily blocking internet access to any website, except in respect of the work we and other ISPs do in support of the Internet Watch Foundation,” BT said in a statement. “This relates to the most illegal and harmful material on the web - images of child sexual abuse. The IWF's role ensures that no ISP makes its own judgement on what to block."

“Our position is shared by many consumer voices and others in our industry and BT shall make that position clear at talks with the minister,” it added.

ISPs are expected to meet with Culture Minister Ed Vaizey next week to discuss the issue further.

Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here

From around the web

User comments

I am guessing MPs have never heard of proxy sites.

Plus chances are sites with perfectly legit uses will also be blocked e.g. rapidshare.

By tech3475 on 1 Apr 2011

I once witnessed an MP...

..ask why, a disabled child who spit a scratched and had to have three rows of seats on a bus to be transported, couldn't just be put in a cage on the bus.
We had to explain (gently) this wasn't CON-AIR but Special Needs transport and the child was disabled, not a criminal.

These people are so far out of touch with reality it makes my eyes bleed to think about it.

God only knows what rudimenty vision these overpaid idiots have of how the internet actually works.

Lets have a referendum on MP's wages and expenses, while cancelling the Debacle Economy Bull.

By cheysuli on 1 Apr 2011

This is a little like blocking Dixons from selling cds because consumers are making illegal copies. Where is the common sense?

By jagdipa on 1 Apr 2011

BT "happy to block... by a third-party regulator"

A third party regulator headed by the BPI, perhaps?

I thought the defence of 'only obeying orders' went out with the Nuremberg trials.

By greemble on 1 Apr 2011

This is an idiot's idea... They need help!

First off – Where is justice when a site can be excluded from the Web without the due process of law?
Second off… The courts forced Newzbin offline and it re-appeared as Newzbin in a matter of weeks. Newzbin is one of the key targets and they have already set themselves up so that visitors will simply bypass any blocking whatsoever and, as a by product, their identity is hidden and it is deep packet inspection proof.
Then there are VPNs and Proxy servers… This legal move is so uninformed
The Chinese have been trying to control access for many years. They have pretty much failed for anyone but a basic user and they spent an awful lot of money trying to do it.

By Kevin000 on 3 Apr 2011

Aside from the accepted understanding that MPs are idiots, blocking websites I want to get to on the basis that an unelected, unremovable body of people with a vested interest in controlling access is utterly, fundamentally wrong.

I thought Britain was against censorship? or is that against it until it doesn't suit us any more?

By bubbles16 on 4 Apr 2011

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

advertisement

Most Commented News Stories
More From PC Pro
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest ReviewsSubscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.